Hope of Israel Ministries (Ecclesia of YEHOVAH):
Jacob’s Trouble -- and a People Called the Jews!
The Jews have honed their predatory expertise at exploiting the weaknesses of White societies into a weapon of devastating potency. We must recognize the Edomite Jews for what they are: our relentless enemies who will stop at nothing to eradicate the White race. The Jews are driven by a fanatical religious imperative, an immutable spiritual depravity, to destroy the White race. The Jews will not rest until they have exterminated all traces of the distinctive White genetic heritage through race mixing, dysgenics, and the destruction of any community (no matter how small or isolated) that even resembles a habitat that could sustain White prosperity.
by HOIM Staff
That we of Israel are moving into a time of unprecedented trouble becomes more apparent with the passing of each week. Many of you reading this article are well aware of the significance of this time, which the Bible refers to as "the time of Jacob's trouble." The prophet Jeremiah spoke of this time of challenge and trouble for YEHOVAH God's servant people, Israel, the peoples which comprise the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred peoples -- the nations which comprise modern Christendom.
Notice what Jeremiah writes in chapter 30 of his book:
Alas! For that day is great, so that none is like it; and it is the time of Jacob's trouble, but he shall be saved out of it. "For it shall come to pass in that day," says the LORD of Hosts, "that I will break his yoke from your neck, and will burst your bonds; foreigners shall no more enslave them. But they will serve the LORD their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up for them" (verses 7-9).
That this was written down for us today is verified by the apostle Paul in Romans 15:4, where he writes:
"For whatever things were written before were written for our learning, that we through the patience and comfort of the Scriptures might have hope."
This is a very important and revealing "end time" or "latter day" prophecy that Jeremiah spoke over 2,700 years ago. It has certainly come to pass, even as Jeremiah prophesied, as we are now seeing that oppressors have placed a yoke of economic bondage upon the neck of YEHOVAH's Israel servant people today. Unfortunately, this is a truth of which most people are completely ignorant. For example, how many people know to whom we owe our National Debt, which in the United States now amounts to several trillions of dollars? This, indeed, is a tremendous burden and yoke upon YEHOVAH's people Israel! However, there is a wonderful promise incorporated in verse 7 of Jeremiah's prophecy, wherein we are told that YEHOVAH God will burst the economic chains which bind us when He and the Messiah come with great power and glory.
Before we go on to read verses 10-11 of Jeremiah 30, we should note well what Moses warned YEHOVAH's people Israel about after he brought them out of Egypt. Moses instructed the 12 tribes that blessings or curses would come upon them, depending on whether they obeyed, or disobeyed, the laws, commandments, and judgments of YEHOVAH God. We read of this in the 28th chapter of Deuteronomy, and should realize that this warning is still in effect today. Take time to read it!
It is abundantly clear that the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Scandinavia, Australia, New Zealand, and the other white Christian nations of Europe, have forsaken YEHOVAH's moral laws and commandments and no longer honor them. As a result, the curses, or judgments of YEHOVAH God, as found above, have come upon the United States and all the other Israelite nations.
Notice verses 43-44 in particular: "The alien who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower. He [the alien] shall lend [our National Debt] to you [all of the Israelite nations], but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head [leaders and rulers], and you shall be the tail (NKJV)."
Have you ever wondered how the National Debt of the United States, and the other Israelite nations, has gotten so astronomically high? Have you ever wondered why we, as a nation and people, seem helpless to stop the tremendous flow of drugs that are now destroying a great portion of our youth, or the continual immoral, filthy movies and TV programs that continue to pour out of Hollywood? And what about the debauched music that has taken over the minds of so many of our people -- both young and old? This is just the tip of the iceberg! We cringe when we see what has happened to our once-decent nation. It is because of our sins that we are being destroyed by a people that YEHOVAH God condemned centuries ago.
A very interesting and timely prophecy by Moses, that relates to our day, can be found in Deuteronomy 31, verses 28-29:
Gather to me all the elders of your tribes, and your officers, that I may speak these words in their hearing and call heaven and earth to witness against them. For I know that after my death you will become utterly corrupt, and turn aside from the way which I have commanded you; and evil will befall you in the latter days, because you will do evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke Him to anger through the work of your hands.
This long-range prophecy is being fulfilled before our very eyes today.
Because of the evil and wickedness that now prevails among our people Israel, many are fearful in our cities to venture out in the evenings; they have numerous locks on their doors; they have to be concerned about what filth might come into their homes on the TV or over the Internet; or if our women or children are going to be abducted or molested. And, on top of all that, we need to be very concerned about the godless philosophies which so many of our people are embracing today. These are being promoted on every venue.
As we, as a people, refuse to hear, honor, and obey the Laws of YEHOVAH God, these conditions will get worse and worse. We are paying a very high price for having forsaken the ways of the LORD our God.
In the early verses of Deuteronomy 28, YEHOVAH God proceeds to list the many blessings and to speak of the prosperity that would come upon His Israelite people, simply as a result of honoring His laws, commandments, and judgments that were given to regulate the life and morality of the Israelite people. YEHOVAH God is holding us accountable.
In Malachi 4 YEHOVAH God says that "the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the LORD of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch. But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall. And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in the day that I shall do this, saith the LORD of hosts."
The prophet Malachi is describing the return of YEHOVAH God and the coming of the Messiah, who are going to see that YEHOVAH's people Israel tread down their enemies under their feet. However, this will only occur when YEHOVAH God takes charge of this whole mess and clears away the enemies of His people Israel.
Just who are the present-day enemies of YEHOVAH's people Israel?
The First Occasion of Jacob's Trouble
Jacob and Esau were twin brothers born to Isaac and Rebekah. The Bible tells us that they struggled together in Rebekahs womb, a foreshadowing of their troubled relationship. Esau was born first and thereby became legal heir to the family birthright which included, among other things, being heir to the Covenant between YEHOVAH God and Abraham. This birthright was a link in the line of descent through which the Promised Messiah was to come (Numbers 24:17-19).
In contrast with Esau, who was a skillful hunter and his fathers favorite, Jacob was a plain man, dwelling in tents (Genesis 25:27), and his mother's favorite. The Hebrew word for plain is the same word translated in other Scripture as perfect, upright, undefiled. So the word plain refers to Jacob's character as a man of YEHOVAH God. YEHOVAH God records His highest praise and blessing for Jacob: "The LORD hath chosen Jacob unto Himself (Psalm 135:4)."
Esau came from the field, and he was faint: "And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me...with that same red pottage (stew); for I am faint (Genesis 25: 29-30)." Knowing the character of his brother, Jacob replied: "Sell me this day thy birthright (25:31)." Esau had no interest in spiritual things so he agreed, saying: "I am at the point (about) to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me? (25:32-34)." Esau could not have been at the point to die by missing one meal but he revealed how worthless he considered the birthright.
When Issac was close to death it became time to give Esau his blessings. Isaac asked Esau to go hunt for a special meal after which he would pass the blessing. Rebekah overhead and helped Jacob disguise himself as Esau and bring Isaac the meal instead while his brother was still hunting. Because Isaac had poor sight he was tricked into giving the blessing to Jacob. Esau was enraged and Jacob had to run away to save his life.
The apostle Paul referred to Esau as a profane (godless) person (Hebrews 12:16). Before their births, YEHOVAH God knew that Esau's descendants would become enemies of Israel for generations to come and He knew Jacob was a man of integrity. He had preordained that Jacob would be in the lineage of the Messiah.
Genesis 32 is the story of Jacob’s return to Canaan after having been exiled from his homeland for 20 years. His exile occurred after he obtained his divinely promised birthright through shrewd, if not unscrupulous, means from his brother Esau, resulting in his having to flee Canaan for fear of his life due to Esau’s vengeance. Jacob found refuge in the region of Babylonia at his Uncle Laban’s home where he married Laban’s two daughters, Leah and Rachel. Eventually, Jacob had to flee Babylon with Laban in angry pursuit. As Jacob and his family are returning to Canaan, they encounter Jacob’s brother Esau who, along with his small army, physically stood in Jacob’s way to prevent him from entering the land of his promised inheritance, and wanted to kill Jacob in the process.
This account is not only the story of Jacob’s personal, spiritual struggles, but it also has end-times prophetic implications relating to the re-gathering out of exile of the twelve tribes of Israel and their return to their Promised Land in Israel under Yeshua their Messiah at his future appearance. The Scriptures refer to this as Jacob’s Trouble (see Jeremiah 30:7).
The Jewish sages believe that the encounter between Jacob and Esau (no doubt informed by Jeremiah’s prophecy) is prophetic in nature, and will happen again in the end times, but this time on a much larger scale, and this time involving the numerous descendants of Israel and Esau. The end-times Israelites will be attempting to return to their ancestral homeland, while the descendants of Esau will be blocking their way. As we proceed in this article, we will see whether this prophecy is beginning to come to pass in these last days.
Not only this, but the Jewish sages speak of two major redemptions in Israel’s long history. The first redemption occurred when YEHOVAH delivered the oppressed and enslaved children of Israel out of Egypt at the Exodus. The second or final redemption will occur at the end of this present era when the Messiah will re-gather and lead his Father's exiled and scattered Israelite people back to the Promised Land in fulfillment of numerous biblical prophecies.
Rolling the film backwards a little in the present story of Jacob, Laban had chased Jacob out of the area of Babylon, and yet Jacob was being blocked from entering Canaan by his murderous brother Esau (or Edom meaning "red"). This is reminiscent of Pharaoh chasing the Israelites out of Egypt only to find themselves blocked by the Red Sea, which is a prophetic picture of Edom. In both instances, YEHOVAH’s people were forced to rely totally on Him for deliverance from their enemies who were in front of and behind them.
Initially, Jacob deals with the crisis in a typically human way -- by scheming and conniving instead of having faith in YEHOVAH God to work things out. He figured that by bribing angry and bloodthirsty Esau with wave after wave of gifts, he might appease Esau and assuage his brother’s desire for revenge (see Genesis 32:13–20).
Jacob’s attempts at appeasing Esau gained him nothing except a lighter pocket book. His surrendering to the Messenger of YEHOVAH God (Genesis 32:22–32) gained him not only the Promised Land and a nation, but the whole world and a place in YEHOVAH’s eternal kingdom.
Interestingly, as part of his efforts to save his own skin from his vengeful brother, Jacob divided his family into two camps with the hopes that if Esau killed one, the other would survive and vice versa. This was another one of his schemes that did not work, but which has tremendous end-time prophetic implications. Genesis 32:2 records that Jacob called the name of the place where he split his family into two camps Mahanaim, which is a Hebrew word meaning "two camps," and is the plural of the root word machanah meaning "encampment, camp, camp of armed host, army camp, company or body of people."
This spot is near the River Jabok, which is a tributary to the Jordan River, and is located on the east side of that river in the modern country of Jordan. During the time of the nation of ancient Israel, it was located in the Gilead region on either the border between Gad and Reuben or Gad and Ephraim. The Song of Solomon makes reference to mahanaim in chapter 6:13 where we read,
Return, return, O Shulamite; return, return, that we may look upon you. What will you see in the Shulamite? As it were the company [m’kolah] of two armies [mahanah].
The Hebrew word m’kolah means "dance." We see a correlation between the Song of Solomon 6:13 and Genesis 32:2, since mahanaim in Genesis, and machneh or "two armies" in the Song of Solomon, are the same word; the former is the plural and the latter is the root word.
What is the prophetic significance between these two biblical passages? It appears that Genesis 32 is a prophetic shadow-picture of just how Jacob’s descendants will come back into the land of their inheritance at the Messiah’s future appearance. This prophetic scenario is confirmed by the Jacob’s trouble prophecy in Jeremiah 30:7, where the context is the returning from captivity and exile of the YEHOVAH’s people-- the House of Israel and the House of Judah (see v. 3). This prophecy, along with the raising up of David at the end-times resurrection of the dead to rule over (under the Messiah) a re-gathered and reunited Israel (v. 9), hasn’t yet occurred.
Prior to this, the people of Israel will be divided into two camps as they enter the land of Israel, and will have to again confront Esau or Edom -- many of whose descendants comprise the modern people known as Jews, who will be occupying Israel and blocking the way. Both camps (the House of Israel and the House of Judah) are, and will be, returning out of the end-times nations they have been sojourning in, where they have been in servitude to the pagan Babylonian the Great World Order system, even as Jacob was a servant to Laban (who lived in the area of ancient Babylon).
The House of Judah and the House of Israel will not defeat modern Esau/Edom through appeasement (Genesis 32:20), as Jacob tried to do with Esau. Appeasement got Jacob nowhere except monetarily poorer, and the modern nations of Israel (primarily the United States) are dealing with the Jews at times, as Jacob did with Esau, by giving in to their demands in exchanging land and prisoners for peace. Appeasement didn’t work for Jacob, and it’s not presently working for the United States.
As our father Jacob did, so we end-time Israelites will have to wrestle with man and YEHOVAH God (Genesis 32:28) in order to return to the Promised Land. YEHOVAH’s people will have to prevail with YEHOVAH and demonstrate to him that they are serious about wanting to possess their promised inheritance and, at the same time, overcome themselves (the carnal and sinful man within) with their pride and self-reliance, and the notion that they will return to the land of Israel by their own strength and prowess apart from YEHOVAH’s divine direction and empowerment.
The Descendants of Esau
The descendants of Esau became known as "Edomites" or as "Edom," and dwelt in Mount Seir (Genesis 36:8-9) which YEHOVAH God gave to Esau for a possession (Deuteronomy 2:5, Joshua 24:4). This land was also known as "Idumea" (Isaiah 34:6) and lay south of the Dead Sea, stretching south to its seaport at Elath (Deuteronomy 1:2; 2:1, 8), and included the area known as Petra. After the conquest of Judah by the Babylonians, some of the Edomites, who had mixed with the "Jews" in their land, resettled with them in Judea (see Jeremiah 40:11-12). Two centuries later, all of Edom was driven out of Mount Seir. This we find recorded by John D. Davis in A Dictionary of the Bible:
The Edomites were driven from Petra westward by the Nabatheans in 312 B.C., and before the Middle of the second century B.C. they were occupying, not only southern Judah, but also Hebron and the country to its north as far as Bethzur (1 Maccabees 4:29; 5:65).
Writes Charles A. Weisman:
The Nabatheans now occupied Mt. Seir and the Edomites were driven into the old territory of Judah. The Maccabean family (a remnant of the true Judahites) had ruled Judea from 166 to 37 B.C., and under Judas Maccabee (I Mac. 5:3), recaptured the city of Hebron from the Edomites in 164 B.C. During the time of John Hyrcanus (135-105 B.C.), the nephew of Judas, the Judahites [true Israelites of the tribe of Judah] were again faced with the hostility of the Idumeans. Hyrcanus confronted the Edomites causing a decisive change in the relations between the two factions (Who is Esau-Edom, p. 7).
As a result of this, the Encyclopaedia Judaica makes the following statement:
John Hyrcanus conquered the whole of Edom and undertook the forced conversion of its inhabitants to Judaism (Joseph., Ant. XIII, 9, 1). Thenceforth the Edomites became a section of the Jewish people (1971, p. 378).
The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (1977) reiterates the same account (p. 589). The Jewish Encyclopedia backs this up by saying that, at this juncture of time, the Edomites "were then incorporated with the Jewish nation, and their country was called by the Greeks and Romans 'Idumea' (Mark iii. 8; Ptolemy, 'Geography,' v. 16)" (Vol. V, (1904), p. 41).
Herod the "Great"
However, as Weisman notes, "the tide turned in favor of the Edomite faction when Julius Caesar made Antipater, an Edomite, Procurator of Judea in 47 B.C. When Antipater was killed four years later his son Herod gained power but was rejected by the Judahites." Then "Herod shrewdly gained the support of Rome. With a Roman army at his heels he returned to Palestine, and after a six-month siege he captured Jerusalem, and became king of Judea in 37 B.C. (Who is Esau-Edom, p. 3)."
History records that Herod was a shrewd and violent tyrant, who was utterly despised by the Judahites because he was an Idumean and descendant of Esau and, therefore, not one of their own stock. In turn Herod hated the people of Judah, and one of his acts when he assumed power was to execute forty-five of the leaders of the old aristocracy to eliminate any threat to his throne. Once secure as king of Judea, he next eliminated the priestly line of Hyrcanus, the last of whom was Antigonus. Finally he murdered Aristobulus, the last of the Aaronic high priests, and attempted to affiliate himself with the high priesthood by marrying Mariamne, Aristobulus' sister -- and the daughter of a high priest.
In an attempt in ingratiate himself with the people of Judea, Herod rebuilt the Temple at Jerusalem that was in ruins from repeated sieges -- including that of his own when he captured Jerusalem. As a result, the Temple of YEHOVAH God became, in a sense, Herod's temple and was popularly referred to as such.
So we find that, in the years before the birth of the Messiah, Judea was controlled by an Edomite faction who usurped the Judahite name, land, and heritage. Writes Charles Weisman, "Under Hyrcanus, the Edomites were forced to be part of Judean culture; but under Herod the Herodian faction had control over the Judean's culture and way of life" (ibid., p. 8).
In opposition to YEHOVAH's laws, some Judahites had intermixed with Edomite, Canaanite, and other alien peoples at the time they returned from the Babylonian captivity, thus making the populace of Judea more culturally diverse (Ezra 9:1-2; Nehemiah 13:3, 23-25). These mixed-blood people were also hostile toward the Judean Israelites.
It should be understood that the land was not the Kingdom of Judah, but had become the nation of the Jews (Judeans). Writes Charles Weisman,
Historically the Edomites became known as 'Jews,' a term derived from 'Judea,' which was derived from the name 'Judah,' being the royal line of Israel, though they [the Edomites] were never of Judah or Israel (ibid., p. 8).
As we have already noted, the Herodian Dynasty that ruled over Judea was founded by Herod the Great, an Idumean, who was only a proselyte to Judaism. "Politically," states Nancy L. Kuehl, "his allegiance was to Antony and Cleopatra and later, to Augustus who conferred upon him the title of king. It was through Roman military aid that Herod had solidified his position in Judea by defeating the Jewish [Israelite] Hasmonean kings (A book of Evidence: The Trials and Execution of Jesus, pp. 133-1340)."
The Make-Up of the Judean Religious Authorities
After consolidating power, Herod instituted the Idumean-Hellenic Babylonian-Alexandrian priesthood in Judea. He appointed as the first high priest one Hanamel, a Babylonian. He then married Mariamne I, a royal granddaughter of Hyrcanus the priest and, after putting her to death, married Mariamne II, the daughter of Simon Boethus, a man he later appointed as high priest.
"The [Idumean-]Hellenistic and Babylonian influence upon the Jewish priesthood," writes Nancy Kuehl, "would forever change Judaism. These individuals were known to have demonstrated the views, political, religious, and economic, of their crafty monarch [Herod]. Together, the Herodians and the priesthood, became the aristocratic ruling class in Judea, reflecting Roman politics and Greek culture and learning so prominent in the pagan societies surrounding Judea (ibid., p. 134)." These were the religious authorities that the Messiah took to task.
The scriptures tell us that the Judean religious authorities, the Scribes, Pharisees, Sadducees, and most of the "Jews" who they represented, were not Israelites. The Scribes and Pharisees admitted this with their own mouths when they said: "We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man" (John 8:33).
To understand this properly let's go back a few steps. There is a very good reason why the "Jews", as represented by the Scribes and Pharisees, received harsh comment from the Messiah, and why they rejected and killed him. It is to do with who they were. YEHOVAH God referred to these people in Isaiah Chapter 6:
And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed (Isaiah 6:9-10).
It is clear from this passage that YEHOVAH God did not want "this people", whoever they might be (note He did not say "My" people), to understand His message and be converted. But we know that it was the "Jews" who YEHOVAH was speaking about because the Messiah quotes these very same verses when the disciples ask him why he speaks to the "Jews" in parables:
And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given...For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them (Matthew 13:10-11,15).
Firstly, the Messiah uses the terms "you" and "them". When Yeshua said to the disciples "unto you it is given," it should be obvious that he didn't mean that the disciples were the only twelve people on the earth who would ever be able to understand his message. The Messiah was, therefore, referring to a particular group of people of whom the disciples formed but a part. Likewise, when he said "but to them it is not given", the Messiah wasn't referring only to that gathering of people who happened to be present on the sea shore on that particular day, but again to a larger group represented by that gathering. So by his use of the terms "you" and "them," it is clear that the Messiah was referring to two separate and distinct groups of people.
Secondly, Yeshua confirms that these people were not allowed to understand ("unto them it is not given"). So we can't just brush this under the carpet by claiming that the Messiah was talking about "believers" and "unbelievers". Surely we have to hear, understand, and accept the message before we can become a believer. Therefore, everyone is an unbeliever to begin with. So we cannot say that a person does not understand, and accept, the message because they are an unbeliever, but rather they are an unbeliever because, for whatever reason, they have not yet understood and accepted the message.
Even the disciples had to have the parables of the kingdom explained to them. Remember, the Messiah never explained them to the multitudes. Thomas continued to doubt right up until the end. No, this was an act of YEHOVAH God as per His own prophecy as recorded in Isaiah Chapter 6. These people were not allowed to understand, and the Messiah confirms the reason why. So they would not be converted. Furthermore, he makes it clear that they can never be converted ("lest at any time they...be converted").
So who are these people who were, and are never allowed, to partake of the Kingdom of YEHOVAH God? We know that the Messiah was sent to Israel and to Israel alone: "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15:24). This is why, when sending the disciples out to preach the kingdom message, he instructed them:
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel (Matthew 10:5-6).
The Messiah’s mission was clearly to his "lost sheep", the house of Israel. Now look at what he said to the Scribes and Pharisees:
I am the good shepherd and know my sheep, and am known of mine…But ye believe not because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me (John 10:14, 26-27).
Note carefully that he did not tell them that they were not his sheep because of their failure to believe. In fact, he said the very opposite. He told them that the reason they did not believe was because they were not of his sheep. Do you see the difference? It is very important. If you check your concordance you will find that the term "sheep" is used literally dozens of times throughout the scriptures to refer to the nation of Israel -- YEHOVAH's chosen people. So could it be that these people, the "Jews", were not, and are not, Israelites? The Pharisees provide us with the answer. In their response to the Messiah's statement "the truth shall make you free", the Pharisees give us an astounding piece of information that is vital to a proper understanding of the scriptures. Again:
We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man (John 8:33).
The Pharisees here state that they were descended from Abraham, but had never been in bondage. However, we know that all Israel was in bondage in Egypt (Exodus 1:1-5,13-14). Therefore, the Pharisees could not be Israelites. Now do not believe anyone who tells you that the Pharisees were lying when they made this statement, since the Messiah not only does not rebuke the Pharisees for lying, but a few verses later actually confirms what they say:
I know that ye are Abraham's seed...[but]...If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham (John 8:37, 39).
The Messiah accepts their claim of descent from Abraham, but says that they are not "Abraham’s children". What does he mean by the expression "Abraham's children"? There is no need to attempt to spiritualize this expression away as many do, since Paul provides us with a full explanation of it in Romans 9:
For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed (Romans 9:6-8).
He then goes on to explain how the promises passed to Jacob. Paul is telling us here that not all of those calling themselves "Abraham’s children" are actually Israelites. He explains that, being descended from Abraham, is not sufficient to make them "children", but rather that only the "children of the promise" (i.e. those descended from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob), are counted for the seed (the promises passed down from Abraham through Isaac to Jacob/Israel). So the "children" the Messiah is speaking about in John Chapter 8 are the "children of the promise". And, in case we are still in any doubt as to the identity of the "children of the promise", Paul confirms it for us:
For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises (Romans 9:3-4).
Paul is telling us, well after the Messiah has been and gone, that the "children of the promise" are his literal brethren -- flesh and blood Israelites, descendants of Jacob/Israel. So we see that in John Chapter 8 the Messiah does indeed confirm the revelation by the Pharisees that they were not Israelites. They could not be Israelites as they were not the "children of the promise", i.e. they were not descended from Jacob/Israel. Didn't you ever think it odd that the Pharisees never claimed to be descended from Jacob, only ever claiming descent from Abraham? Now you know the reason why.
Of course, there will still be those who will want to spiritualize these verses away. For this reason, great care must be taken with the sentence: "For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel" (KJV), especially if you use a modern translation like the NIV. Modern versions tend to swap the two clauses of this sentence around and render it: "For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel." Read literally this translation is nonsensical. What the translators are attempting to do here is to have us believe that Paul is talking about a "spiritual Israel", i.e. the Church. But this idea totally contradicts the rest of Paul's teaching in these verses we have just studied above. Indeed, Paul went to great pains in them, and also elsewhere, to make it clear that both he and the Messiah were referring to the literal, flesh and blood, Israelites.
The "Jewish" historian Flavius Josephus, writing around 69 A.D., also confirms that the Pharisees were not true flesh and blood Israelites:
For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect...are called Essenes. These last are Jews by birth (Flavius Josephus, The Jewish War, Book II, Chapter VIII, sec. 2)
Josephus is clearly telling us that the Pharisees and Sadducees were not "Judahites" by birth, i.e. they were converts to Judaism and therefore, imposters.
So who were these "Jews"? To make it as plain as possible, they were a group of people who:
1. were descended from Abraham;
2. were not in captivity in Egypt;
3. were not "children of the promise" (descendants of Jacob);
4. were present in Judea in large numbers during the time of the Messiah; and
5. were excluded from the Kingdom of YEHOVAH God.
Only one group of people fits this description. They are a very prominent group in Bible history who the scriptures tell us are to be cut off from the kingdom for all time. They are Edom, the Edomites, the descendants of Esau, who despised and threw away his birthright and the promises. The book of Obadiah records for us the wrath which is to be poured out on Edom as punishment for their treatment of their brethren Jacob/Israel:
For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off forever (Obadiah 10).
The Edomites Disappear From the Scene
During Titus' siege of Jerusalem, according to The Jewish Encyclopedia (1904, Vol. V, p. 41), "20,000 Idumeans appeared before Jerusalem to fight in behalf of the Zealots who were besieged in the Temple." Roughly 97,000 inhabitants of Judea were taken captive, and an unknown number had fled either before or during the siege. "This," according to Weisman, "is the last mention of the Edomites as a people in history. Yet Bible prophecy indicates that Edom would be an enemy of Israel in latter times." So where did they go?
According to Heinrich Ewald in his History of Israel (Vol. 5, p. 239), the Edomites were also cast out of Judea in 70 A.D. when the Romans sacked Jerusalem, and were dispersed in different directions, with many thousands known to have migrated northward to Asia Minor and around the Black Sea region. Another author states:
At the fall of the Roman Empire, the Edomite Jews became scattered over all of Europe, with the majority settling down in the Turco-Mongolian (Khazaric) area of Russia, where they [later] intermarried with the heathen Khazars who had converted en masse to Judaism.
Also, after the fall of Jerusalem in 586 B.C., the Edomites migrated northward and, while the extent and ultimate destination of this northward movement is not found in history, it is thought by some that at this time it also brought many Edomites to the region of what later became Khazaria. While some Edomites fled to the Caucusus regions due to their mountainous nature, those who stayed behind in Judea had good relations with the Romans until the Second Jewish Revolt when they too, along with some true Hebrew Israelites, were expelled from Jerusalem for good and fled north to the Caucusus region.
As well as to the Caucusus regions, the Edomite Pharisees and Sadducees also immigrated to parts of Europe with their Babylonian Talmud, Kabbalah, and other extra-Biblical writings.
The Mountain Jews
The Edomites that settled in the Caucusus region eventually became known as "Mountain Jews." According to Wikipedia: "According to local [Mountain] Jewish tradition, some 19,000 Jews departed Jerusalem (used here as a generic term for the Land of Israel) and passed through Syria, Babylonia, and Persia and then, heading north, entered into Media...Mountain Jewish traditions are infused with teachings of Kabbalah and Jewish mysticism."
Mountain Jews With Their Fur Hats (Papakha)
Modern Hasidic Jew With His Fur Hat
An article published in the New York Times in 1902 states: "They [the Mountain Jews] knew some little of the customs of modern Jews, but they held that there was no authority for them. They did not believe in the resurrection nor credit the coming of the Messiah."
The same day the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to him [the Messiah] and asked him...Jesus answered and said to them [the Sadducees], 'You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God (Matthew 22:23, 29).
The Bible revels that Esau's dwelling was to be "far away from the fertility of the earth" (Genesis 27:39, N.A.S.V.). This we find with the Mountain Jews of the Caucusus. "Like the Jew," explains Weisman, "Esau never had a home in a rich and fertile land. The Edomites original nation, Mount Seir, was a rocky and calcareous country, and God later made it even more desolate....The desolation that God brought upon the race or nation of Edom was to be a permanent condition regarding the prosperity and civilization of this people (Who is Esau-Edom, pp. 25-26)."
After YEHOVAH God had made Edom's original nation desolate, they would no longer have any great nation or cities of its own: "I will make thee a perpetual desolation, and thy cities shall not return: and you shall know that I am the LORD (Ezekiel 35:9)."
Daghestan, the country in the Caucusus that is home to the majority of Mountain Jews, is a dry and mountainous land, with peaks reaching heights of 14,652 feet. Rainfall is very scarce in the mountains, and wide areas are devoid of vegetation. North of the Terek, Dagestan broadens out to include most of the rolling sandy plain of the Nogay steppe, as far as the Kuma River, which forms the republic’s northern boundary. The climate in that area is hot and dry, with only 8-10 inches of rain a year. Vegetation is of a semi-desert character and is dominated by sagebrush. As a whole, the republic’s climate is hot and dry. A perfect fulfillment of Genesis 27:39.
The Khazars Arrive on the Scene
The origin and history of the Khazars and the Khazar kingdom, and their relationship to the origin and early history of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe, was one of history's best kept secrets until wide publicity was given, in recent years, due to research on this subject. In the first century B.C. the Khazars invaded eastern Europe from their homeland in Asia. The Khazars invaded eastern Europe via the land route between the north end of the Caspian Sea and the south end of the Ural Mountains.
The Khazars were not "Semites." They were an Asiatic Mongoloid nation. They are classified by modern anthropologists as Turko-Finns racially. From time immemorial the homeland of the Khazars was in the heart of Asia. They were a very warlike nation. The Khazars were driven out of Asia finally by the nations in Asia with whom they were continually at war. The Khazars invaded eastern Europe to escape further defeats in Asia. The very warlike Khazars did not find it difficult to subdue and conquer the 25 peaceful agricultural nations occupying approximately 1,000,000 square miles in eastern Europe. In a comparatively short period of time the Khazars established the largest and most powerful kingdom in Europe, and probably the wealthiest also.
The Khazars were a pagan nation when they invaded eastern Europe. Their religious worship was a mixture of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship practiced in Asia by pagan nations. This form of worship continued until the seventh century. The vile forms of sexual excesses indulged in by the Khazars as their form of religious worship produced a degree of moral degeneracy the Khazar's king could no longer endure.
The Conversion to Judaism
In the seventh century King Bulan, ruler at that time of the Khazar Kingdom, decided to abolish the practice of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship and make one of the three monotheistic religions, about which he knew very little, the new state religion. After a history session with representatives of the three monotheistic religions, King Bulan decided against Christianity and Islam and selected as the future state religion the religious worship then known as "Talmudism," and now known and practiced as "Judaism." This event is well documented in history.
"Some historians believe that the [Mountain] Jews of the Caucasus introduced Judaism into the kingdom of the Khazars in the eighth century (Jewish Communities in Exotic Places by Ken Blady (Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 2000), pages 158-159)."
"Mountain Jews used ALL sorts of very ancient Jewish names! That fact can speak that their ancestors...after arriving in the Caucasus, stayed there in relative isolation...Talmud names were widely popular among medieval Jews of the Near East and Europe... As already shown, there are reasons to believe that East-Caucasian [Mountain] Jews significantly influenced the character of Khazar Judaism... (Igor Semyonov, "About Early Contacts Between East-Caucasian Jews and Khazars", a report read at the 7th Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference on Judaica, February 1, 2000 (translated from Russian))."
Phallic worship and other forms of idolatry were thereafter forbidden. The Khazar kings invited large numbers of rabbis to come and open synagogues and schools to instruct the population in the new form of religious worship. It was now the state religion. The converted Khazars were the first population of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe. So-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe after the conversion of the Khazars are the descendants of the Khazars converted to "Talmudism," or as it is now known "Judaism," by the mass conversion of the Khazar population.
After the conversion of King Bulan, none but a so-called or self-styled "Jew" could occupy the Khazar throne. The Khazar Kingdom became a virtual theocracy. The religious leaders were the civil administrators also. The religious leaders imposed the teachings of the Talmud upon the population as their guide to living. The ideologies of the Talmud became the axis of political, cultural, economic and social attitudes and activities throughout the Khazar kingdom. The Talmud provided civil and religious law.
The Jewish Encyclopedia has five pages on the Khazars but I will skip through them:
CHAZARS: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of Jews of Russia...driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own desire for plunder and revenge...In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westward...The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (885)...
At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood at the height of its power and was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, together with a large number of his people; embraced the Jewish religion...The Jewish population in the entire domain of the Chazars, in the period between the seventh and tenth centuries, must have been considerable...about the ninth century, it appears as if all the Chazars were Jews and that they had been converted to Judaism only a short time before...
It was one of the successors of Bulan named Obadiah, who regenerated the kingdom and strengthened the Jewish religion. He invited Jewish scholars to settle in his dominions and founded synagogues and schools. The people were instructed in the Bible, Mishnah, and the TALMUD and in the 'divine service of the hazzanim'...In their writings the Chazars used the Hebrew letters...the Chazar languages predominated...
Obadiah was succeeded by his son Isaac; Isaac by his son Moses (or Manasseh II); the latter by his son Nisi; and Nisi by his son Aarron II. King Joseph himself was a son of Aarron, and ascended the throne in accordance with the law of the Chazars relating to succession...The king had twenty-five wives all of royal blood, and sixty concubines, all famous beauties. Each one slept in a separate tent and was watched by a eunuch...this seems to have been the beginning of the downfall of the Chazar kingdom...
The Russian Varangians established themselves at Kiev...until the final conquest of the Chazars by the Russians... After a hard fight the Russians conquered the Chazars...Four years later the Russians conquered all of the Chazarian territory east of the Azov...Many members of the Chazarian royal family emigrated to Spain...Some went to Hungary, but the great mass of the people remained in their native country.
Hasdai ibn Shaprut, who was foreign minister to Abd-al-Rahman, Sultan of Cordova, in his letter to King Joseph of the Chazars (about 960 AD) "...speaks of the tradition according to which the Chazars once dwelt near the Seir Mountains." Thus we have it from Jewish sources that the Khazars originally "dwelt near the Seir Mountains" so are racially of Edomite stock.
The Fall of the Khazar Empire
Directly north of the Khazar Kingdom, at the height of its power, a small Slavic state was organized in 820 A.D. on the south shore of the Gulf of Finland where it flows into the Baltic Sea. This small state was organized by a small group of Israelite Varangians from the Scandinavian peninsula on the opposite shore of the Baltic Sea. This infant nation was even smaller than the state of Delaware. This newly-born state, however, was the embryo which developed into the great Russian Empire. In less than 1000 years since 820 A.D., this synthetic nation expanded its borders by ceaseless conquests, until it now includes more than 9,500,000 square miles in Europe and Asia -- or more than three times the area of the continental United States.
During the tenth, eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries the rapidly expanding Russian nation gradually swallowed up the Khazar kingdom, its neighbor directly to the south. The conquest of the Khazar kingdom by the Russians supplies history with the explanation for the presence, after the thirteenth century, of the large number of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in Russia. The large number of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe after the destruction of the Khazar Kingdom, were thereafter no longer known as Khazars, but as the "Yiddish" populations of these many countries. They so refer to themselves today.
In the many wars with her neighbors in Europe after the thirteenth century, Russia was required to cede to her victors large areas which were originally part of the Khazar Kingdom. In this manner Poland, Lithuania, Galicia, Hungary, Rumania, and Austria were acquired from Russia territory, originally a part of the Khazar Kingdom. Together with this territory, the nations acquired a segment of the population of so-called or self-styled "Jews" descended from the Khazars, who once occupied the territory and who were converted to Judaism by the Edomite Jews of the Caucusus.
These frequent boundary changes by the nations in eastern Europe explains the presence today of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in all these countries who all trace their ancestry back to the converted Khazars. Their common language, their common culture, their common religion, and their common racial characteristics, classify them all, beyond any question of doubt, with the Khazars who invaded eastern Europe in the first century B.C., and were converted to "Talmudism" in the seventh century by the Edomite Mountain Jews.
This is why Hasdai ibn Shaprut, in his letter to King Joseph of the Chazars, "…speaks of the tradition according to which the Chazars once dwelt near the Seir Mountains." As we have seen, the "Seir Mountains" were none other than the original land of Esau-Edom: "Thus dwelt Esau in Mount Seir: Esau is Edom (Genesis 36:8)." Seir was a mountain range south of the Dead Sea and was also known as the "land of Edom" (Genesis 36:21). The Seir mountains were the home of the Edomites for nearly a millennium. "The Edomites arrived in Edom or Seir at the end of the 14th and beginning of the 13th century B.C. (Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 6, p. 372)."
King Edward I and the Edomite Jews of England -- Another Phase of Jacob's Trouble
With two peoples so opposite in character as Jacob (the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic-Scandinavian nations) and Esau (modern Jews), one must predominate over the other. They can never have mutual agreement or equal status. Explains Weisman:
If the laws, religion, government and morals that are characteristic of Jacob are followed in the land, then those of Esau are rejected. Esau will, by the nature of his character, be under the subjection of Jacob. And so it was with the Jews in much of European and American history (Who is Esau-Edom? p. 73).
Due to their contrasting traits, when the white race (Anglo-Saxon-Celtic-Scandinavian nations) governs, the Jew (Esau) will always be in a subservient position. All of history verifies this. In a white Christian nation, the Jew will always be the "tail."
Between the years 250 A.D. and 1948 A.D. -- a period of 1,700 years -- Jews have experienced more than eighty expulsions from various countries in Europe -- an average of nearly one expulsion every twenty-one years. Jews were expelled from England, France, Austria, Germany, Lithuania, Spain, Portugal, Bohemia, Moravia, and seventy-one other countries. If Jews had been exiled, expelled, or otherwise done away with by one or two countries, you could possibly make a case for this fable of “anti-semitism,” or that maybe just certain people had a problem with the Jews. However, when it gets to the point that you have a list of 109 different exiles from 84 different places, with some of them having to do so repeatedly, one is forced to start looking at the Jew himself as the problem, and not those attempting to free themselves from the grasp of these parasites.
Just the fact that many countries were forced to repeatedly exile the Jews, proves that these are relentless parasites, who will stop at nothing to gain control of our countries, enslave our people, and commit genocide against all peoples of the earth.
All these expulsions dispels the myth that “zionism” (which didn’t appear until 1898) and “zionists” are the root source of today’s problems. Both of these are merely symptoms of a much larger problem with the entire Jewish race. None of the countries exiled just some of the Jews, and none were foolish enough to simply consider them a religion or ideology. The Jews were exiled, and expelled, as an entire race then, and should be dealt with as an entire race now. Let's look at one of the expulsions that occurred over the 1,700 year period.
England -- 1290 A.D.
On 18 July, 1290, every professing Jew in England was ordered out of the Realm, for ever, by King Edward I. Between sixteen and seventeen thousand Jews had to flee, and none dared return until four hundred years later.
As the tribes of Israel made their way across Europe, and finally into the British Isles, the Edomites were not far behind!
The first Jews to settle in England were undoubtedly Jews from Normandy, and in England they multiplied their number and their money, until their expulsion in 1290. According to the Jewish Encyclopedia (1906), "William of Malmesbury states that William the Conqueror brought Jews from Rouen to England. William the Conqueror's object may be inferred: his policy was to get feudal dues paid to the royal treasury in coin rather than in kind, and for this purpose it was necessary to have a body of men scattered through the country who would supply quantities of coin (article, 'England')." This initiated the next phase of "Jacob's Trouble."
The Jews of England flourished, travelled many miles around Europe and profited through their usurious proclivities and mercantile pursuits. They lived lavishly, owned great mansions and bought up English land when the English failed to meet their loans.
The ostentation which possession of great wealth enabled the Jews to display, and their unconcealed contempt for the practices of Christianity, made them an object of universal dislike; as usurers, moreover, they had gained a strangle-hold on the recently founded monastic houses whose splendid buildings they had financed, and on many of the smaller aristocratic families... (From Domesday Book to Magna Carta (1951), p. 353).
The Jews in medieval England built "the great Synagogue" just a short walk from the Tower of London. This was an error for which many Jews paid later, on their short walk to the Tower for their execution. The Synagogue was used not only for religious ceremony, but also to "invite" claims against Christian debtors, effecting a settlement of their debts. One of the richest Jews in England around 1255 was Abraham of Berkhamstead. Abraham was a very active Jewish usurer who had debtors in half the counties of England, from Devon to Yorkshire. Orders were issued by Abraham to the sheriffs that debtors pay up, within a month of Easter following, or else their chattels would be seized.
All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate peoples into a state of poverty, especially farmers, working-class people, and the very poor (Pope Clement VIII, 1592).
For the next 224 years the Edomite Jews preyed upon the people of England with their predatory money practices and heartless confiscation of British wealth.
The Jews and Ritual Murder
These practices, along with ritual murder, were the English Jews undoing. The first known case of ritual murder occurred in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were finally expelled from the realm by Edward I. At Norwich, in that year, a twelve year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree.
A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine; and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne, but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.
John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Ballandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish ritual murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) It is made clear that his career, quite apart from this ritual murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage!
In 1255, in Lincoln, a boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of the Messiah. The boy’s mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Jopin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed.
Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) said of this case "They [the Jews] crucify a child at Lincoln, for which eighteen are hanged." There are no "ifs" and "buts" here! Copinus said, "For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice." No-one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and Judaized non-Jews alike unite in denying the fact of this ritual murder.
On 17 November 1278 all Jews of England, believed to have numbered around 3,000, were arrested for coin clipping and counterfeiting, and all Jewish homes in England were searched. At the time, coin clipping was a widespread practice, which Jews were primarily engaged in, and a financial crisis occurred as a result. According to one contemporary source, the practice reduced the currency's value to half of its face value. In 1275, coin clipping was made a capital offence, and in 1278, raids on suspected coin clippers were carried out.
According to the Bury Chronicle, "All Jews in England of whatever condition, age or sex were unexpectedly seized…and sent for imprisonment to various castles throughout England. While they were thus imprisoned, the innermost recesses of their houses were ransacked." Some 680 were detained in the Tower of London. More than 300 are believed to have been executed in 1279. Those who could afford to buy a pardon and had a patron at the royal court escaped punishment.
Then, in 1279, in Northampton, another child was crucified. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: "They [the Jews] crucify a child at Northampton for which fifty [Jews] are drawn at horses’ tails and hanged." (Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. 15; H. Desportes, Le Mystére du Sang.)
Eleven years later, in 1290, another ritual murder was recorded in the Patent Roll 18 of Edward I (m.21, 21st June), which contains an order for the jail delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.
Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved to be the last straw in toleration for the king. The coin-clipping scandal of 1278 was probably another factor in Edward's decision because of the economic consequences.
The Edomite Jews were not allowed to return to England until the time of Oliver Cromwell (1656).
A significant fact is that Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, at least up to 1847, quoted the Ritual Murders in Norman and Plantagenet England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the 1860s, all mention of them is extirpated! It seems obvious that Jewish Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the 19th. century. H. D. Traill, in his book Social England Concerning Ritual Murders in England, states: "It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial and so frequent (1893, Vol. I, p. 407)."
The Return of Jacob's Trouble Under Cromwell
Edomite Jewish bankers from Amsterdam, led by the Jewish financier and army contractor of Cromwell’s New Model Army Fernandez Carvajal, and assisted by Portuguese Ambassador De Souza, a Marano (secret Jew), saw an opportunity to exploit in the civil unrest led by Oliver Cromwell in 1643. A stable Christian society of ancient traditions, binding the true Judahite Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and people into one solemn bond, was disrupted by Cromwell’s Protestant uprising. The Jews of Amsterdam exploited this civil unrest and made their move. They contacted Oliver Cromwell in a series of letters:
Cromwell To Ebenezer Pratt of the Mulheim Synagogue in Amsterdam, 16th June 1647:
In return for financial support will advocate [re]admission of Jews to England: This however impossible while [King] Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.
To Oliver Cromwell From Ebenezer Pratt, 12th July 1647:
Will grant financial aid as soon as [King] Charles removed and Jews [re]admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.
On November 12th that same year, King Charles was given the opportunity to escape. He was, of course, recaptured. Hollis and Ludlow, authorities on this chapter of history, are both on record as considering the flight as the stratagem of Cromwell. After King Charles had been recaptured events moved apace. Cromwell had the British Parliament purged of most members he knew were loyal to the monarchy. Notwithstanding this drastic action, when the House sat all night on December 5th, 1648, the majority agreed "That the concessions offered by the king were satisfactory to a settlement."
Any such settlement would have disqualified Cromwell from receiving the blood-money promised him by the Edomite International Money-Barons through their agent E. Pratt, so Cromwell struck again. He ordered Colonel Pryde to purge Parliament of those members who had voted in favor of a settlement with the King. What then happened is referred to, in school history books, as Pryde’s Purge.
When the purge was finished fifty members remained. They are recorded as The Rump Parliament. They usurped absolute power. On January 9th, 1649, "A High Court of Justice" was proclaimed for the purpose of putting the king of England on trial. Two thirds of the members of the Court were "Levelers" from Cromwell’s Army.
The conspirators couldn’t find an English lawyer who would draw up a criminal charge against King Charles. Carvajal, then, instructed an alien Jew, Isaac Dorislaus, Manasseh Ben Israel’s Agent in England, to draw up the indictment upon which King Charles was tried. As a result, Charles was found guilty of the charges leveled against him by the International Jewish money-lenders -- not by the people of England.
On January 30th, 1649, he was publicly beheaded in front of the Banqueting House at Whitehall London. The Jewish money-lenders, directed by the High Priests of the Synagogue of Satan, had had their revenge because Edward I had previously expelled the Jews from England. Oliver Cromwell received his blood-money, just as Judas had done with the Messiah.
Beginning in 1655 Cromwell, through his alliance with the Jewish bankers of Amsterdam, and specifically with Manasseh Ben Israel and his brother-in-law David Abravanel Dormido, initiated the resettlement of the Jews in England.
Here we possibly find the first mention of the Jews overwhelming desire to remove YEHOVAH God's legally ordained leader of His people Israel. This right of kingship is found in the book of Genesis: "The scepter [a symbol of kingship] shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh comes (49:10)."
The Jews and the Bank of England
William Stadholder, a rather ordinary Dutch army careerist, had money problems. The Jews saw another opportunity, and through their influence arranged for William’s elevation to Captain General of the Dutch Armed Forces. The next step up the ladder for William was his elevation, by the Jews, to the aristocratic title of William, Prince of Orange.
The Jews then arranged a meeting between William and Mary, the eldest daughter of the Duke of York. The Duke was only one place removed from becoming King of England. In 1677 Princess Mary of England married William Prince of Orange.
To place William upon the throne of England, it was necessary to get rid of both Charles II and the Duke of York, who was slated to become James II of the Stuarts. It is important to note that none of the Stuarts would grant a charter for an English national bank. That is why murder, civil war, and religious conflicts, caused by the Jewish bankers, plagued their reigns.
In 1685, King Charles II died and the Duke of York became King James II of England. In 1688 the Jews ordered William Prince of Orange to land in England at Torbay. Because of an ongoing campaign of L’Infamie against King James II, contrived by the Jews, he abdicated and fled to France. William of Orange and Mary were proclaimed King and Queen of England.
No sooner was the Dutch General sitting upon the throne of England when he soon got England involved in costly wars against Catholic France, which put England deep into debt. William then persuaded the British Treasury to borrow £1,250,000 from the Jewish bankers who had put him there. Here was the Jewish bankers’ chance to collect.
School books inform British children that the negotiations were conducted by Sir John Houblen and Mr. William Patterson, on behalf of the British Government, with money-lenders WHOSE IDENTITY REMAINED SECRET. Search of historical documents reveals that, in order to maintain complete secrecy, the negotiations regarding the terms of the loan were carried on in a church. In the days of the Messiah the money-lenders used the Temple. In the days of William of Orange they desecrated a church.
The Jewish international money-lenders agreed to accommodate the British Treasury to the extent of £1,250,000 providing they could dictate their own terms and conditions. This was agreed to. The terms were in part :
1. That the names of those who made the loan remain secret; and that they be granted a Charter to establish a Bank of England.
2. That the directors of the Bank of England be granted the legal right to establish the Gold Standard for currency by which --
3. They could make loans to the value of £10 for every £1 value of gold they had on deposit in their vaults.
4. That they be permitted to consolidate the national debt; and secure payment of amounts due as principal and interest by direct taxation of the people.
Thus, for the sum of £1,250,000, King William of Orange sold the people of England into economic bondage. The Edomite Jewish money-lenders gained their ambitions. They had usurped the power to issue and control the currency of the nation. And, having secured that power, they cared not who made the laws.
Just what the acceptance of the Gold Standard, according to the Jews dictates, meant is best illustrated by citing a simple transaction:
The directors of the Bank of England could loan £1,000 for every £100 worth of gold they had on deposit as security. They collected interest on the full £1,000 loan. At 5 per cent this amounted to £50 a year. Therefore at the end of the first year the bankers collected back 50 per cent of the amount they had originally put up to secure the loan. If a private individual wished to obtain a loan, the bankers made him put up security, in the form of property, stocks, or bonds, much in excess of the value of the loan he required. If he failed to meet payments of principal and interest, foreclosure proceedings were taken against his property, and the moneylenders obtained many times the value of the loan.
The international bankers never intended that England be allowed to pay off the national indebtedness. The plan was to create international conditions which would plunge ALL nations concerned deeper and deeper into their debt. So King William, under orders from the Elders of Zion in Amsterdam, persuaded the British Treasury to borrow 1.25 million pounds sterling from the Jewish bankers who had helped him to the throne. Since the state’s debts had risen dramatically, the government had no choice but to accept. Parliament accepted and the Jewish bankers sunk their tentacles into Great Britain.
According to Captain A. M. Ramsay in his book, The Nameless War,
Oliver Cromwell back in the 17th century, became a traitor when he acted as a paid agent of Edomite Jews who co-conspired with him to usurp the throne of England out from under King Charles the II. These so called "Jews" were of the same ilk banished from England by King Edward back in the late 13th century. They were not of the blood line of Jacob/Israel but were in fact descendants of Esau/Edom as described in Genesis chapter 28.
They were impostors who claimed to be of the house of Israel and are referred to in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 as Jews, "which say they are Jews, (of the tribe of Judah) and are not, but do lie," and the lie continues up to this present day! Evidently Cromwell believed their lies and accepted bribe money when he re-admitted them in 1657. Soon, the economy of England began to suffer from the effects of Jewish usury, known as the thievery of fractional reserve banking. Since that fateful day, the British [Israelite] people have slowly been bled of all their wealth and their vast empire.
Enter the Rothschilds
Mayer Amschel Bauer opened a money lending business on Judenstrasse (Jew Street) in Frankfurt Germany in 1750, and changed his name to Rothschild. Mayer Rothschild had five sons. The smartest of his sons, Nathan, was sent to London to establish a bank in 1806. Much of the initial funding for the new bank was tapped from the British East India Company which Mayer Rothschild had significant control of. Mayer Rothschild placed his other four sons in Frankfort, Paris, Naples, and Vienna. In 1814, Nathanael Rothschild saw an opportunity in the Battle of Waterloo. Early in the battle, Napoleon appeared to be winning and the first military report to London communicated that fact. But the tide turned in favor of Wellington.
A courier of Nathan Rothschild brought the news to him in London on June 20. This was 24 hours before Wellington’s courier arrived in London with the news of Wellington’s victory. Seeing this fortuitous event, Nathan Rothschild began spreading the rumor that Britain was indeed defeated. With everyone believing that Wellington was defeated, Nathan Rothschild began to sell all of his stock on the English Stock Market. Everyone panicked and also began selling causing stocks to plummet to practically nothing. At the last minute, Nathan Rothschild began buying up the stocks at rock-bottom prices. This gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy -- now the financial center of the world -- and forced England to set up a revamped Bank of England with Nathan Rothschild in control.
The Jews and the French Revolution
We just showed how a small group of foreign money-lenders, operating through their English agents, remained anonymous while they secured control of Britain's economy for the modest sum of £1,250,000. Some of these International Jewish money-lenders or their successors, plotted and planned, and helped finance, the great French Revolution of 1789, in exactly the same way as they had plotted and planned and financed the English Revolution of 1640-1649. The descendants of these same International Jewish Financiers have been the Secret Power behind every war and revolution from 1789 onwards. They continued to be Jacob's Trouble.
The Jewish Encyclopedia says Edom is in modern Jewry. This is a very important admission, because the word Edom means Red. Over the door of his shop on Judenstrasse, Mayer Amschel Bauer placed, as his sign of business, A RED SHIELD. It is of the greatest importance to remember that the Jews in Eastern Europe, who belonged to the revolutionary movement based on terrorism, had also adopted the Red Flag as their emblem, because it represented Blood. Knowing the secret significance of the Red Shield, Amschel Mayer Bauer decided to adopt it as the new family name. Red Shield in German is Roth Schild and thus The House of Rothschild came into being.
It is also important to remember that the Red Flag was the symbol of the French Revolution -- and every revolution since. More significant still is the fact that when Lenin, financed by International Jewish Bankers, overthrew the Russian Government and established the first Totalitarian Dictatorship in 1917, the design of the flag was a Red Flag, with a Hammer and Sickle, and the Star of Judea imposed.
In 1773, when Mayer Rothschild was only thirty years of age, he invited twelve other wealthy and influential men to meet him in Frankfort. His purpose was to convince them that if they agreed to pool their resources they could then finance and control the World Revolutionary Movement, and use it as their Manual of Action to win ultimate control of the wealth, natural resources, and man-power of nations.
Rothschild revealed how the English Revolution had been organized. He pointed out the mistakes and errors that had been made, with the view to avoid them in the future. Even after all these mistakes had been made, the initial purpose of the revolution had been achieved. The bankers who instigated the revolution had established control of the national economy of Britain and consolidated the national debt. By means of intrigue carried out on an international scale, they had increased the national debt steadily by loaning the money to fight the wars and rebellions they had fomented since 1694.
Basing his arguments on logic and sound reasoning, Mayer Rothschild pointed out that the financial results obtained as the result of the English Revolution would be as nothing when compared to the financial rewards to be obtained by a French Revolution -- provided those present agreed to unity of purpose and put into effect his carefully thought out and revised revolutionary plan. The project would be backed by all the power that could be purchased with their pooled resources. This agreement reached, Mayer Rothschild unfolded his revolutionary plan.
By clever manipulation of their combined wealth it would be possible to create such adverse economic conditions that the masses would be reduced to a state bordering on starvation by unemployment. By use of cleverly conceived propaganda it would be easy to place the blame for the adverse economic conditions on the King, His Court, the Nobles, the Church, Industrialists, and the employers of labor.
Their paid propagandists would arouse feelings of hatred and revenge against the ruling classes by exposing all real and alleged cases of extravagance, licentious conduct, injustice, oppression, and persecution. They, would also invent infamies to bring into disrepute others who might, if left alone, interfere with their over-all plans.
After the general introduction to build up an enthusiastic reception for the plot he was about to unfold, Rothschild turned to a manuscript and proceeded to read a carefully prepared plan of action. This manuscript became known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. This meeting is said to have taken place, in 1773, at Rothschild's home on Judenstrasse.
The Marquis of Mirabeau
Once this policy had been decided upon, agents of the new Supreme Council contacted the Marquis of Mirabeau as the most likely person in France to serve their ends. He belonged to the nobility. He had great influence in court circles, he was an intimate friend of the Duc D’Orleans whom they had decided they would use as Front Man to lead the French Revolution. But more important still, the Marquis of Mirabeau was devoid of morals and his licentious excesses had led him heavily into debt.
It was a simple matter for the Edomite money-lenders to have their agents contact Mirabeau, who was a famous French orator. Under the guise of friends and admirers they offered to help him out of his financial difficulties. What they actually did was lead him down the “Primrose Path” into the very depths of vice and debauchery, until he was so deeply in their debt that he was forced to do their bidding. At a meeting to consolidate his debts, Mirabeau was introduced to Moses Mendelssohn, one of the big Jewish financiers who took him in hand. Mendelssohn in due time introduced Mirabeau to a woman, famous for her personal beauty and charm but without moral scruples.
This stunning Jewess was married to a man named Herz, but, to a man like Mirabeau, the fact that she was married only made her more desirable. It wasn’t long before she was spending more time with Mirabeau than she was spending with her husband. Heavily in debt to Mendelssohn, tightly ensnared by Mrs. Herz, Mirabeau was completely helpless. He had swallowed their bait hook, line, and sinker. But, like good fishermen, they played him gently for a time. If they exerted too great a pressure the leader might break, and their fish might get away.
Their next move was to lead him into compromising situations which mysteriously became public. This method of destroying a man’s character became known as the practice of L’Infamie. Because of scandals and organized detraction, Mirabeau was ostracized by many of his social equals. His resentment produced a desire for revenge and thus he embraced the revolutionary Cause.
We have seen this same modus operandi used today by the Jews in the U.S. government in their conspiracies against President Trump, Justice Kavanaugh, and others associated with these Jewish victims.
The Duc D'Oleans
Mirabeau’s task was to induce the Duc D’Orleans (Louis Philippe II, cousin of the king) to lead the Revolutionary Movement in France. It was implied that once the King had been forced to abdicate he would become the Democratic Ruler of France. The real plotters of the French Revolution were careful not to let either Mirabeau or the Duc D’Orleans know they intended to murder the King and Queen, and thousands of the nobility. They made Mirabeau and the Duc D’Orleans believe that the purpose of the revolution was to free politics and religion from superstition and despotism.
Mirabeau soon led his friend the Duc D’Orleans down the same “Primrose Path” which had led to his own social ostracism. In exactly four years, the Duc D’Orleans was so heavily in debt that he was PERSUADED to engage in every form of illegal traffic and trade to recuperate his losses. But, in some mysterious manner, his ventures always seemed to go wrong, and he lost more and more money. By 1780 he owed 800,000 livres. Once again the Edomite money-lenders came forward and offered him advice in regard to his business transactions and financial aid. They very nicely manoeuvred him into the position of signing over to them as security for their loans, his palace, his estates, his house, and the Palais Royal. The Duc D’Orleans signed an agreement under which his Jewish financiers were authorized to manage his properties and estates so as to ensure him sufficient income to meet his financial obligations and leave him a steady and adequate income.
The Duc D’Orleans had never been too bright in regard to financial matters. To him the agreement he signed with his Jewish Bankers appeared to be a sound financial deal. They had offered to manage his business affairs and turn them from a dismal failure into a great financial success. What more could he want? It is doubtful if he even suspected he had sold himself body and soul to the Agents of the Devil. But he had done so. He was completely in their hands.
Choderlos de Laclos
The Secret Powers directing the French Revolution appointed Choderlos de Laclos to manage the Palais Royal and the Duc D’Orleans’ estates. De Laclos is thought to have been a Jew of Spanish origin. When he was appointed manager of the Palais Royal he was acclaimed as the author of Les Liaisons Dangereuses and other pornographic works. He publicly defended his extreme immorality on the grounds that he studied the politics of love in all its varied aspects because of his love of politics.
It matters little who Choderlos de Laclos was, it is what he did that is of importance. He turned the Palais Royal into the greatest and most notorious house of ill-fame the world has ever known. In the Palais Royal he established every kind of lewd entertainment, licentious conduct, shameless shows, obscene picture galleries, pornographic libraries, and staged public exhibitions of the most bestial forms of sexual depravity. Special opportunities were provided for men and women who wished to indulge in every form of debauchery. The Palais Royal became the center in which details of the campaign for the systematic destruction of the French religious faith and public morals were conceived and carried out. This was done on the Jewish Kabalistic theory that the best revolutionary is a youth devoid of morals.
Associated with de Laclos was a Jew from Palermo named Cagliostro, alias Joseph Balsamo. He turned one of the Duc’s properties into a printing house from which he issued revolutionary pamphlets. Balsamo organized a staff of revolutionary propagandists. In addition to literature they organized concerts, and plays, and debates calculated to appeal to the very lowest instincts of human nature and further the revolutionary cause. Balsamo also organized the spy-rings, which enabled the men who were the Secret Power behind the revolutionary movement to put into operation their plan of L’Infamie to be used for systematic character assassination.
Men and women, who were enticed into the web spun by de Laclos and Balsamo, could be blackmailed into doing their bidding. Thus it was the Duc D’Orleans’ estates were turned into the Center of Revolutionary Politics while, under the guise of lecture halls, theatres, art galleries, and athletic clubs, the gambling rooms, brothels, and wine and drug shops did a roaring trade. In this revolutionary underworld potential leaders were first ensnared. Their consciences were at first deadened by evil associations and then killed by indulgence in evil practices. The estates of the Duc D’Orleans were turned into factories in which the Secret Power manufactured the pieces they intended to use in their game of International Chess.
Evarts Seelye Scudder, who wrote Prince of the Blood, says of the Palais Royal: “It gave the police more to do than all other parts of the city”. But as far as the public was concerned, this infamous place was owned by the Duc D’Orleans, the cousin of the French king. Only a mere handful of men and women knew that the Edomite moneylenders controlled it, and used it to create a revolutionary organization which was to be the instrument of their revenge, and their manual of action to further their secret aims and ambitions.
The sister of Marie Antoinette wrote her personal letters warning her of the revolutionary plot, the connection of the Jewish International Bankers, and her own danger. Marie Antoinette (1755 - 1793) was the daughter of the Emperor Francis I of Austria. She married Louis XVI of France. She just couldn’t bring herself to believe the terrible things her own sister told her were being plotted by the Edomite Jews. How wrong she proved to be is a matter of history. Because she refused consistently to heed her sister’s repeated warnings she and her husband died under the guillotine.
Here, again, we see the Edomite Jews' hatred of YEHOVAH God's royal line descended from Judah, the son of Jacob (Genesis 49:10).
The majority of today's students of history believe Marie Antoinette was a woman who entered fully into the spirit and gaiety of the French Court. It is generally accepted, as a fact, that she engaged in many affairs d’amour with her husband’s close friends, and indulged in reckless extravagances. This is the picture Balsamo and his propagandists painted of her. The fact that they made their L’Infamie stick enabled them to have the mob demand her life. But their version of the conduct of Marie Antoinette is a pack of lies, as historians have proved. The fortitude with which she bore the sufferings inflicted upon her by her enemies, the dignity with which she met her fate, and the resignation and courage with which she offered up her life on the scaffold, cannot be reconciled with the characteristics of a wanton woman.
The English Connection
Another piece of evidence, which connects the English Edomite Jewish moneylenders with the plot to bring about the French Revolution, was unearthed by Lady Queensborough, author of Occult Theocrasy. While doing some research work she read a copy of L’Anti-Semitisme written by a Jew named Bernard Lazare and published in 1849. With the leads obtained from this book, Lady Queensborough claims Benjamin Goldsmid, his brother Abraham, and their partner Moses Mecatta, and his nephew Sir Moses Montifiore, were Jewish financiers in England who were definitely affiliated with their continental Jewish brethren in the plot to bring about the revolution in France. Further evidence was found to tie Daniel Itsig of Berlin, and his son-in-law David Friedlander, and Herz Gergbeer of Alsace in with the Rothschilds and the plot. Thus are revealed the men who, at that time, constituted the Secret Power behind the World Revolutionary Movement.
Knowledge of the methods these men used to manoeuvre the French Government into financial difficulty is of importance, because it set the pattern they followed in America, Russia, Spain and other countries afterwards.
Sir Walter Scott, in volume two of The Life of Napoleon, gives a clear story of the initial moves. He then sums up the situation with these words: “These financiers used the Government (French) as bankrupt prodigals are treated by usurious money-lenders who, feeding the extravagance with one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the most unreasonable recompenses for their advances. By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and various rights granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were brought to a total confusion.”
After the Government of France was forced into the position of seeking huge loans because of debts incurred in fighting wars to further the secret ambitions of the International Conspirators, they very kindly offered to supply the money providing they could write the terms of the agreement. On the surface their terms were most lenient. But again they set the stage in the person of one M. Necker. He was to be appointed to the French King’s Council as his Chief Minister of Financial Affairs. The Jewish financiers pointed out that this financial wizard would pull France out of her monetary troubles in less than no time at all. What he actually did during the next four years was to involve the French Government so badly with the Edomite Jewish financiers that the National Debt of France increased to £170,000,000.
Captain A. H. M. Ramsay sums up the situation aptly in The Nameless War. He says : “Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic....When the debt-grip has been firmly established, control of every form of publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full grip on industrialists, [both management and labor]. The stage is then set for the revolutionary blow. The grip of the right hand of finance establishes the paralysis; while the revolutionary left hand that holds the dagger and deals the fatal blow. Moral corruption facilitates the whole process.”
While Balsamo’s propaganda sheets damned the higher officials of both Church and State, special agents organized the men who were to be used as leaders in the Reign of Terror planned to accompany the revolutionary effort. Among these leaders were Robespierre, Danton, and Marat. To conceal their real purpose, the men who were to release the prisoners and lunatics to create the necessary atmosphere for instituting the preconceived Reign of Terror, met in the Jacobean Convent.
Within the walls of this convent the details of the bloody plan were worked out. The lists of reactionaries marked down for liquidation were compiled. It was explained that while the criminals and lunatics ran wild terrorizing the population by committing mass murders and publicly performing rapes, the organized underground workers, under direction of Manuel, Procurer of the Commune, would round up all the important political figures, heads of the clergy, and military officers known to be loyal to the King.
The men who were to emerge from the Jewish organized underground were formed into Jacobin Clubs. Under leaders, who were well versed in the duties required of them to direct the Reign of Terror, they conducted the mass atrocities so they would serve the purpose of their hidden masters, and move them further towards their ultimate goal.
The Edomite Jews Role in the American Revolution
Meanwhile, on the other side of the Atlantic, a revolution was about to start against George III, King of Great Britain. It’s obvious that the American colonies had legitimate reasons to demand independence, but what’s odd about this uprising, is the fact that a large number of those promoting the revolt were actually members of secret societies. Once again the spot-light is beamed upon a massive lie: Not only was the American Revolution NOT a spontaneous uprising against tyranny, we Americans have also been fooled into believing we "won" that war.
Dominated by Edomite Jewish bankers, the private Bank of England expanded its investments into North America, largely through the Hudson Bay Company. The early American colonists of the 17th Century were beholden to the Bank of England’s Jewish owners -- paying taxes from their labor -- as repayment for funding the “opportunity” to create a new way of life in the New World. Struggling to be released from the burden of debt to the Bank of England, the colonists established the Massachusetts Bay Company, printing its own home-grown paper money in 1690, a currency not backed by silver or gold. In other words, it was a fiat money, rejected by England’s parliament, in a continual conflict with their American subjects regarding taxes and all other debts.
By 1742, with every colonial Royal Governor instructed to curtail the issue of colonial money, the British Resumption Act required that taxes be paid in gold. This caused a depression in the colonies -- property was seized by the Royalists for one-tenth of its value.
The following should be digested remembering that the Edomite Jews were responsibility for the English and French revolutions -- in fact they are more than likely responsibility for ALL revolutions!
The Marquis Lafayette
In 1777 a wealthy Frenchman, the Marquis de Lafayette (whose full name was Marie Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Montierin), "...purchased a ship and with a crew of adventurers [revolutionaries] and sailed for America to fight in the revolution against the British. He joined the ranks as a major general and was assigned to the staff of George Washington. He served with distinction, leading American forces to several victories (www.americanrevolution.com/LafayetteCitizenship.htm)."
According to the website cited above, Lafayette came from a long line of soldiers; he studied at the Military Academy in Versailles and became a captain in the French calvary at age 16. So we have a professionally trained military expert whipping the American colonists into a fighting force. In 1779 he persuaded the French government to send aid to the Americans.
After Cornwallis' surrender at Yorktown Lafayette returned to Paris where he "cooperated closely with Ambassadors Benjamin Franklin and then Thomas Jefferson," possibly working out the details of the planned Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Lafayette not only fought in the American Revolution along with other French troops, but upon returning to France he began to foment, and then fought in, the French Revolution -- which began in 1791. Then, again in 1830, he "became the leader of a Revolution that dethroned the Bourbons". (The house of Bourbon is a branch of the house of Capet, which constituted the so-called third race of France’s kings. King Louis IX, a Capetian of the “direct line,” was the ancestor of all the Bourbons through his sixth son, Robert, comte de Clermont). Lafayette was, in fact, an international revolutionary!
A Copy of the Declaration
A strange occurrence took place shortly after the Declaration of Independence was written in Philadelphia on July 4, 1776. A copy was sent to Amsterdam by way of the Jewish controlled Caribbean island of St. Eustatius. Before reaching Amsterdam, the Declaration was intercepted at sea by the British navy. An accompanying letter to the Declaration of Independence was also intercepted and sent on to London, being considered written in a secret code about the Declaration that needed to be deciphered. Strangely, the letter turned out to be written in Yiddish!
The question arises: Why was a copy of the Declaration of Independence sent to Amsterdam by way of the Jews at St. Eustatius? It is more than likely that the final details of the planned "American Revolution" were worked out by Jews in that city. However, we are not privy to the content of the letter that accompanied the Declaration -- just the fact that it was written in Yiddish.
It has been said by some historians that in the area of finance the fledgling American government might have floundered except for the supposed financial genius and personal financial risk and support of one Haym Solomon. It is claimed that Solomon died bankrupt due to his "total support" of the American cause. Though small in number, it is said that the Jews in the colonies chose to cast their fate with America. The fact is, the Jews did not cast their fate with America, but cast their fate -- as always -- with the Revolution. The story about Solomon "dying bankrupt" is also highly unlikely since he was a Rothschild agent! When we research into it, we also discover that America did not "win" the Revolutionary War any more than Great Britain lost.
Now let us discover more about Haym Solomon (also spelled Salomon'), his partnership with the Jew Robert Morris, the creation of the First Bank of America, and the loans made to the New World via Solomon's association with the Rothschilds of England.
The Bank of North America was chartered in December 1781, by the Congress of the Confederation and opened on January 7, 1782, at the prodding of Robert Morris. Morris funded the bank with a French loan arranged by Solomon, and his own fortune. The bank was used as a financier of the war. This was thus the nation's first de facto central bank, being the United States' first government-incorporated bank, following in the footsteps of the Rothschild's Bank of England. We'll see once again that the Edomite Jews foment war (Revolution), fund both sides and become immensely more wealthy in the process. This first is from the Jewish World Review at: jewishworldreview.com/jewish/salomon.asp
Born in Lissa, Poland, in 1740, Salomon spent several years moving around western Europe and England, developing fluency in several languages that served him well for the remainder of his life. Reaching New York City in 1772, he swiftly established himself as a successful merchant and dealer in foreign securities.
Striking up an acquaintance with Alexander MacDougall, leader of the New York Sons of Liberty, Salomon became active in the patriot cause. When war broke out in 1776, Salomon got a contract to supply American troops in central New York. In 1777, he married Rachel Franks, whose brother Isaac was a lieutenant colonel on George Washington's staff. Their ketubah resides at the American Jewish Historical Society.
In the wake of a fire that destroyed much of New York City, British occupation forces arrested and imprisoned Salomon. He gained release because the British hoped to use his language skills to communicate with their German mercenaries. Instead, Salomon covertly encouraged the Hessians to desert. Arrested again in early 1778, Salomon had his property confiscated. A drum-head court martial sentenced him to hang. Salomon escaped -- probably with the help of other Sons of Liberty -- and fled penniless to Philadelphia. His wife and child joined him soon afterward.
He arrived penniless, and without property, in Philadelphia, and made what has been referred to as a miraculous recovery:
In Philadelphia, Salomon resumed his brokerage business. The French Minister appointed him paymaster general of the French forces fighting for the American cause. The Dutch, and Spanish governments also engaged him to sell the securities that supported their loans to the Continental Congress.
In 1781, Congress established the Office of Finance to save the United States from fiscal ruin. Salomon allied himself with Superintendent of Finance Robert Morris and became one of the most effective brokers of bills of exchange to meet federal government expenses. Salomon also personally advanced funds to members of the Continental Congress and other federal officers, charging interest and commissions well below the market rates. James Madison confessed that "I have for some time...been a pensioner on the favor of Haym Salomon, a Jew broker.
The Jew, Robert Morris, was an attendee at the treasonous Constitutional Convention in 1787, along with many other Jewish and non-Jewish lawyers, land barons, money-lenders, etc. In a book titled An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, by Charles A. Beard (Macmillan Co., 1913), a biography was given on all fifty-five men present at that gathering. The end-result of that Convention was to enrich those attendees (and their posterity), and to create a strong central government that would become all-powerful as more and more politicians -- especially those in the several states -- succumbed to the lures of money, power and influence.
The writers of the Constitution knew full well that corporate U.S. Government would one day be controlled -- it was already then as it is today -- by the Jews; its function from the beginning was to bring in their New World Order, the unearthly, ungodly plan for World Dominion ruled by a cruel, perverted, coldly calculating, heartless people.
Here's a comment from scripturesforamerica.org/html2/jm0022g.htm:
From the time when the old Jew Amschel Mayer began to cultivate the friendship of William the Landgrave in Germany; down through George III and his need for money, and mercenaries to fight the Colonists in the Revolution, Amschel Mayer was in touch with the American situation through the Jew Haym Solomon of Philadelphia, who made it possible for Robert Morris to finance the Colonials and thus place them under obligations to the International Jews.
Haym Solomon who has been eulogized by Jew and gentile alike for his financial services to the colonies, worked secretly with Mayer, so that once again we find Jews financing and getting rich off both sides in a war.
Benjamin Franklin, a supporter of the colonies printing their own money, stated in his autobiography, that the main cause of the Revolutionary War of 1776 was not the tax on tea or the Stamp Act, but King George’s refusal to accept the paper money of his subjects.
By winning the war in 1783, the colonists thought they were taking control of their own government. Yet, America remained in debt to the Jewish owners of the Bank of England which, by this time, included the Rothschilds, Montefiores, Goldsmids, Mocattas, and the Oppenheimers, (all powerful Jewish families with control of the gold trade), led by Nathan Mayer Rothschild. The United States, in spite of the historical propaganda we are forced-fed with, was NOT free.
A Debt Burdened Nation
The colonists may have won the war but they were still in bondage to the Jewish Bankers. Reeling under the debt, the united States re-introduced taxes to pay off their Jewish masters.
Thus, Alexander Hamilton, agent of international Jewry, pressured Congress to pass the 1791 Assumption Act -- which created America’s first national bank, the First Bank of America, chartered by the private Bank of England for a term of twenty years -- in its plan to control the monies of the so-called “independent” united States. In other words, in creating this bank, America was forced to charter it with the same Jewish bankers that were holding its debts before the “war of independence.”
In 1811, the twenty year contract with the Bank of England expired. The struggling new nation refused to renew the charter with its attendant enslavement. In response, England waged war with America in what we now call the War of 1812. The British invaded Washington DC, burning down the White House, the Treasury Department Building, and the Library of Congress.
Although “court historians” claim that America “won” the War of 1812, it actually lost it. The accumulated debt, as a result of this new war, dictated the creation of a new central bank by European financiers. Thus, in 1816, President James Madison was compelled to sign into law the Second Bank of the United States. And, again, it was chartered by the private Bank of England, which held 80% ownership. And so, America’s enslavement to Jewish bankers continued for yet another 20 years.
Free at Last?
Four years before the charter was set to expire in 1836, President Andrew Jackson vetoed its renewal, putting the Rothschilds and their fellow Jews out of business in America. Jackson not only asserted the unconstitutional minting of U.S. money by private interests, but also had the brains to fix the problem.
Although now misunderstood by economists such as Lyndon LaRouche and associates, for the greater good of America, President Jackson sent federal troops into the states who refused, (albeit indirectly), to pay off the debt to Jewish bankers, forcing those states to collect taxes. For seventy-seven years, although argued that Jewish financing of America’s railroads and gold trafficking kept the nation under Jewry’s thrall, America was no longer under the heel of Jewish bankers. Andrew Jackson, remarkably -- federal force notwithstanding -- paid off the debt.
Jacob's Trouble and the Civil War
General William Tecumseh Sherman, a general in the Northern Army during the Civil War, made a rather cryptic comment in his book Memoirs I: “…the truth is not always palatable and should not always be told (The Hidden Face of the Civil War, by Otto Eisenhiml, p. 5)."
A similar comment was made by the author of the biography of Senator Zachariah Chandler of Michigan, a Senator during the Civil War: “The secret history of these days…concealing many startling revelations, has yet been sparingly written; it is doubtful if the veil will ever be more than slightly lifted (ibid., p. 5)."
Those who have attempted to lift the veil have discovered that there are indeed many hidden truths about this fateful period in American history. One who only hinted at the truth about the real causes of the War was Colonel Edward Mandell House [a Jew], who wrote his book entitled Philip Dru, Administrator, in 1912. In it, he has one of his characters make the following statement: “Cynical Europe said that the North would have it appear that a war had been fought for human freedom, whereas it was fought for money (Philip Dru, Administrator, by Colonel Edward Mandell House, p. 119)."
Is it possible that the Civil War was fought for reasons other than those traditionally offered? Is it possible that the real reasons for the war are among the secrets that some wish not to be revealed? Is it possible that slavery and states rights were not the real causes of the War?
After the demise of the Jewish founded Second Bank of the United States, the state banks, those chartered by the various states in the Union, operated the banking system of the United States and issued all of the money. Almost exclusively, this money was backed by gold -- not by debt and paper money. However, the financial position of the federal government had been slowly deteriorating: “At the outbreak of the war the United States Treasury was in greater shambles than Fort. Sumter. Southern banks had been quietly withdrawing large amounts of funds on deposit in the North. When Lincoln took office, he found his Treasury almost empty (Our Crowd, by Stephen Birmingham, p. 93)."
The Civil War actually started in 1837, the year after the charter of the Second Bank had expired, when the Rothschild family sent one of their representatives to the United States. His name was August Belmont, and he arrived during the panic of 1837. He quickly made his presence felt by buying government bonds. His success and prosperity soon led him to the White House, where he became the, “…financial advisor to the President of the United States (ibid., p. 93)."
Another of the pieces of this enormous puzzle fell into place in 1854, when a secret organization, known as the Knights of the Golden Circle, was formed by George W. L. Bickley (Confederate Agent, A Discovery in History, by James D. Horan p. 16), who; “…declared that he had created the fateful war of 1861 with an organization that had engineered and spread secession (Klandestine, by William H. McIlhany II, p. 12)."
Another leading character in the story of the Civil War was J. P. Morgan, later to become one of America’s most wealthy and influential industrialists and bankers. Mr. Morgan went to Europe in 1856 to study at the University of Gottingen in Germany. It is not inconceivable that one of the people he met while in college was Karl Marx, who was active during this time writing and publicizing his ideas about Communism, since Marx was in and out of Germany on a regular basis; and because Morgan later became an agent for the Rothschild family.
At any rate, it was during this time that the European bankers began plotting the Civil War. “According to John Reeves, in an authorized biography entitled The Rothschilds, the Financial Rulers of Nations, a pivotal meeting took place in London, in 1857. It was at this meeting that the International Banking Syndicate decided that (America) the North was to be pitted against the South under the old principle of ‘divide and conquer.’ This amazing agreement was corroborated by MacKenzie in his historical research entitled The Nineteenth Century (Committee to Restore the Constitution, Fort Collins, Colorado, January, 1976 Bulletin)."
The plotters realized that, once again, the American people would not accept a national bank without a reason for having one, and once again the plotters decided upon a war. Wars are costly, and they force governments into a position where they must borrow money to pay for them, and the decision was made, once again, to force the United States into a war so that it would have to deal with the issue of how to pay for its costs.
Dividing the Country
But the plotters had a difficult problem: what nation could they induce to fight against the United States Government? The United States was too powerful, and no country, or combinations of countries, could match them in a “balance of power” showdown. Canada to the north and Mexico to the south were not strong enough, and couldn’t raise an army adequate for the anticipated conflict, so they were discounted. England and France were 3,000 miles away and across a huge ocean that made the supplying of an invading army nearly impossible. And Russia had no central bank, so the bankers had no control over that nation. That would change in 1917.
So the bankers made the decision to divide the United States into two parts, thereby creating an enemy for the government of the United States to war against. But the bankers first had to locate an issue to use in causing the Southern States to secede from the Union. The issue of slavery was ideal for that purpose.
Next the bankers had to create an organization that could promote secession amongst the southern states, so that they would divide themselves away from the federal government. So, as we have seen, the Knights of the Golden Circle was created for that purpose. Abraham Lincoln began to see the drama unfold as he was campaigning for the Presidency in 1860. He saw the war as an attempt to split the Union, not over the issue of slavery, but just for the sake of splitting the Union. He wrote: “I have never had a feeling politically that did not spring from the sentiments embodied in the Declaration of Independence. If it (the Union) cannot be saved without giving up that principle, I was about to say I would rather be assassinated on this spot than surrender it (Abraham Lincoln, the Boy and the Man, by James P. Morgan, pp. 174-175)."
So many of Lincoln's fellow Americans also saw the war as an attempt to split the Union that, “…it was not uncommon for men to declare that they would resign their officer’s commission if the war was perverted into an attack on slavery (High Crimes and Misdemeanors, The Impeachment and Trial of Andrew Johnson, by Gene Smith, p. 98)."
The Knights of the Golden Circle were successful in spreading the message of secession amongst the various Southern States. As each state withdrew from the Union, it left independently of the others. The withdrawing states then formed a Confederation of States, as separate and independent entities. The independence of each state was written into the Southern Constitution: “We, the people of the Confederate States, each state acting for itself, and in its sovereign and independent character… (Quest of a Hemisphere, by Donzella Cross Boyle, p. 293)."
This action was significant because, should the South win the war, each state could withdraw from the Confederation, re-establish its sovereign nature and set up its own central bank. The Southern States could then have a series of European-Controlled Banks, the Bank of Georgia, the Bank of South Carolina, etc., and then any two could have a series of wars, such as in Europe for centuries, in a perpetual game of Balance of Power politics. It would be a successful method of insuring that large profits could be made on the loaning of money to the states involved.
The War of 1812, was instigated by the Rothschilds to force the renewal of their Charter for the Bank of the United States. When this charter was vetoed by President Andrew Jackson in 1836, the Edomite Jews precipitated a financial panic and set up their plan to bring about the Civil War, which would simultaneously destroy the American Republic and despoil the wealthy Christian families of the South.
The Communist Manifesto of 1848, set Europe ablaze with revolutions, wars, and counter-revolutions. In August 1903, Max Nordau, in his address to the 6th Zionist Congress in Balse, Switzerland, revealed the plan for even greater conflagrations, the coming world wars: “Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward…The Zionist Congress; the English Uganda proposition; the future World War; the Peace Conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.” Onward and upward over the bodies of fifty million more dead Christians was Max Nordau’s ecstatic vision of the coming world war (World War I), and so it came to pass!
But all of these defeats at the hands of Jackson and the American people didn’t deter the bankers from attempting to re-charter the Bank. President John Tyler vetoed two bills in 1841 to revive the Second Bank of the United States. So the Bank’s charter expired in 1836 and, for the next 24 years, until the Civil War started in 1861, the United States had no central bank. So for the years up until 1861, at least, the Jewish bankers had been foiled in their attempts to completely enmesh the United States in the web of a permanent banking establishment.
Judah P. Benjamin
The most prominent Jew on either side during the Civil War, was Judah P. Benjamin, born in the West Indies, a brilliant lawyer, Attorney General, Secretary of War and Secretary of State of the Confederacy. Writing about Benjamin’s days as a student at Yale, Burton J. Hendrick in his Statesmen of the Lost Cause (1939) said: "...that he had been caught stealing from his fellow students; that Benjamin made no public denial of this charge; that all his life he showed a constant apprehension of a biography and destroyed all papers and documents that would facilitate inquiries into his past (p. 164)."
John Slidell (another traitorous Jew), one-time fellow Senator of Judah P. Benjamin from Louisiana, became Confederate envoy to France soon after the Civil War began. Of him, Burton J. Hendrick said:
Long before Slidell attained the Senate…in 1853, the word ‘Slidellian’ had taken on a well-defined meaning…In this proceeding, Judah P. Benjamin was his associate, as in politics generally; and, justly or unjustly, the standing of both men suffered severely…
...similar scandals involving the Techuantepec Railway, in which both Benjamin and Slidell were concerned…His (Slidell’s) ancestry contained perhaps a Jewish strain; at any rate, in Paris he became in intimate of leading Jewish families. One to whom he was especially close was Emile Erlanger, head of the great French (Jewish) banking house of Erlanger et Cie…Erlanger’s son…fell in love with Slidell’s daughter, the spirituelle Matilda, and, from that moment, Confederate and French relations present a romantic association of Haymen and baste finance. Erlanger was made the French intermediary in all Confederate transactions…
"The Erlanger loan (to the Confederacy) found only one party profitable; that was the banking house of Erlanger et Cie. Matilda Slidell’s father-in-law emerged from the transaction with gains not far from $2,700,000…It is a fair estimate that the Confederate Treasury obtained about $2,500,000 from a bond issue for which it had pledged payment…of $15,000,000 in capital and seven percent in interest (Statesmen of the Lost Cause, pp. 220, 231)."
Edwin de Leon, another Jew, was appointed Confederate publicity agent in Paris. Of him, Hendrick said: “On leaving Richmond, the Secretary of State had given de Leon extremely confidential letters from Benjamin to Slidell…Benjamin sought to bribe Napoleon III, into recognizing the Confederacy and breaking the blockade. On the voyage to France, de Leon opened and read these communications; which he presented the documents, with broken seals, to Slidell, that diplomat’s anger knew no restraint (Statesmen of the Lost Cause, p. 391)."
Judah P. Benjamin was chosen by the Rothschilds to do their work in the United States and he was the first adviser to Jefferson Davis, the President of the Southern Confederacy. Benjamin has been called “the brains of the revolt.” He was also the Secretary of State of the Confederacy under Jeff Davis. The Confederacy consisted of eleven Southern States bound by a written Constitution, modeled in part after our own Constitution. It was founded on the fundamental principle that each one of its eleven constituted States had the right to secede from the Union, or to separate from the other 23 out of the 34 states of the Union.
Nevertheless, at the instigation of Benjamin, and under pressure of Napoleon, Texas and Louisiana were placed on the bargain counter in exchange, presumably, for Napoleon’s aid. The latter was supported by Disraeli of England, who had assured the Confederacy of the support of Britain behind the nine remaining States, after Texas and Louisiana were to be ceded to France.
Under the guiding hand of the Edomite Judah P. Benjamin, chosen by the Rothschilds and the Church of Rome to represent the International Bankers to do their work for them in the United States, was also the first advisor to Jefferson Davis, the President of the Southern Confederacy. Benjamin is reputed to be the “brains of the revolt,” as he was also the Secretary of State of the Confederacy.
Through the hands of this man, huge sums of money that were provided to finance the destruction of this great new Christian American Republic, flowed. The Confederacy fell and the men who had fought a valiant fight for what they believed right were thrown into the even greater travail of the Reconstruction. In the aftermath following the end of the Civil War, Benjamin and Jefferson Davis were suspected of plotting the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, carried out by John Wilkes Booth. Fearing that he would be brought to justice, Benjamin fled to the United Kingdom where, with the aid of Lord Rothschild, he obtained a position as a barrister and in 1872 was appointed Queen's Counsel, during the time when Britain's first Jewish Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, was in office.
General Ulysses S. Grant
Civil War Union General William Tecumseh Sherman, on arriving in the South, was astonished by the number of Jewish carpetbaggers and scalawags that he encountered operating in the Confederate states, saying: "I found so many Jews & speculators here trading in cotton and secessionists had become open in refusing anything but gold that I have found myself bound to stop it."
General Ulysses S. Grant was also familiar with the "Jewish problem." On December 17, 1862, Grant wrote to the Assistant Adjutant General of the US Army:
I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the specie regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by the Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officer at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department. But they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any wood yard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at a military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy at an agreed rate, paying gold.
There is but one way that I know of to reach this case. That is for Government to buy all the Cotton at a fixed rate and send it to Cairo, St Louis, or some other point to be sold. Then all traders, they are a curse to the Army, might be expelled.
Grant issued General Order No. 11, which banished all Jews from Tennessee’s western military as follows:
1. The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, are hereby expelled from the Department.
2. Within 24 hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.
3. No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.
In 1868 Grant won the election for presidency, but unfortunately fell under the power of Jewish perfidy. During his eight years as President, he back-pedaled on his position concerning the Jewish problem.
Late in the year of 1865, just a few short months after the battered and exhausted Confederate military had surrendered, bringing the American Civil War to a close, a group of six white Southern war veterans met on Christmas Eve in the law office of Judge Thomas M. Jones of Pulaski, Tennessee. Vowing to rid the South of the predominately Jewish carpetbaggers and scalawags who descended on the former Confederate states like a plague of locusts intent on profiteering by exploiting Southerners, both black and white. Those six veterans were soon joined by hundreds of others the following year as members of a secret vigilante organization named the Ku Klux Klan, whose goal was to end Reconstruction and restore White Southern rule and order by regaining political control of the South. By 1869, Nathan Bedford Forest, the appointed leader of the Ku Klux Klan, resigned his leadership and called for the organization to be disbanded, saying that the Klan was "being perverted from its original honorable and patriotic purposes, becoming injurious instead of subservient to the public peace".
The Jewish hand in the Civil War did not end there. There is abundant evidence of the Edomite involvement in World War I, the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917, and World War II. This we will cover in future articles.
Although Esau was assigned by YEHOVAH God to be a servant of Jacob, there would be a time when Esau would gain would gain dominion over Jacob and "break the yoke" of Jacob from off his neck -- that is to say, destroy the dominion of Jacob. So, did the Edomites ever have dominion over the Israelites in Bible history? No, not once did this ever occur. Therefore, we must look to more recent times to find the fulfillment of this prophecy. "This dominion of Esau, through his wrestling free of the yoke or dominion of Jacob, is being fulfilled through the control and stranglehold the Jews have gained over the white race (Who is Esau-Edom? p. 72)."
One-world dominion has long been a plan of the Jews. This is prevalent in their Zionist movement, which is part of the Jewish ideal of ruling the world. This plan was made explicit by the Jew and Council on Foreign Relations member James P. Warburg, in testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, stating:
We shall have World Government whether or not you like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.
The Jew Baruch Levy, back in the mid 1800s, had clearly expressed the ultimate goals of the Jews:
Baruch Levy (from a letter to Karl Marx), La Revue de Paris, p. 574, June 1, 1928.
The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic, in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this new world order the Jews will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition.
The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the purpose of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which it is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.
The Jews don't await a Messiah or believe any ever existed, rather they are their own Messiah -- and that Messiah, they believe, will one day rule the world.
Jacob's loss of dominion and Esau gaining the dominion over him, marks the start of that period prophesied in the Bible as the "time of Jacob's trouble" (Jeremiah 30:7). Esau's dominion can only exist at the expense of Israel's religion and status. Unlike captivities and afflictions of the past, this captivity is not physical or obvious but a "mystery" due to covert modes of control. It is what some have call the "invisible government."
It would actually take several volumes to fully discuss the Jewish domination in the areas discussed. Many other areas could also be discussed in which Jewish influence and dominion exists over the white Christian nations (e.g., religion, media, culture, laws and education). The manner in which Jews have gained dominion over these areas has been a "mystery" to most, but as the Jew Marcus Eli Ravage states, the dominion is a reality:
You [Christians] make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day?...We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without armies, without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda.
The Leopard Doesn't Change Its Spots
Typical of how these predatory Edomite Jews operate, can be found in a recent Fox News investigation by Tucker Carlson.
Jewish Vulture Capitalist Paul Singer
Paul Singer, a Jew, is an American Venture Capitalist and owner of Elliott Management Corporation (EMC) with a net worth of $3.5 billion, according to Forbes. He was the target of a fiery segment on Tucker Carlson‘s show in which the host lambasted him and Republican Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse for financially ruining the town of Sidney, Nebraska. The segment on Carlson’s show centered around the sporting goods company Cabela’s and how Singer’s hedge fund made $90 million by acquiring the company then forcing the board to sell the company to Bass Pro Shops. After the sale, Sidney lost over 2,000 jobs and the small town was devastated.
"The residents of Sidney did not get rich. Oh no, just the opposite. Their community was devastated, destroyed," Carlson said. "The town lost nearly 2,000 Jobs. A heart-breakingly familiar cascade began."
"People left, property values collapsed, and then people couldn’t leave, they were trapped there. One of the last thriving small towns in this country went under. We recently sent two producers to Sidney, Nebraska, to survey the wreckage there and to consider what happened," Carlson added. "Our producers talked to more than a dozen former Cabela’s employees, almost all of them refused to speak to us on camera, fearful of legal retribution from the famously vicious Paul Singer. But off camera, they told us their story. Here it is."
Cabela’s was headquartered in Sidney and as the company grew, the town grew more prosperous. The company was making over $1 billion a year when Singer’s company, Elliott Management Corporation, acquired the company. Singer drove up the stock price of the company and then sold the company to Bass Pro Shops. His fund made nearly $100 million on the sale.
Carlson also attacked Republican Senator Ben Sasse who stood idly by while the town collapsed. "Ben Sasse is a U.S. senator who represents the state of Nebraska. Sidney, of course, is not large, but you might think about the death of a town in his state would be of concern to Ben Sasse, again, a U.S. Senator from Nebraska," Carlson said. "But so far, it doesn’t seem like he has commented on what happened to Sidney."
Singer is on the Forbes’400 list of richest Americans and is known for his ruthless business tactics and rapaciousness.
This has happened with many other towns in the United States.
Writes Joel Cohen in The UOJ Archives:
There is no shortage of high-profile Jewish crime. Take the infamous New Square scandal, in which four Hassidim were convicted for defrauding the government of $11 million by setting up a fictitious yeshiva to receive federal student aid money. Or the case in Williamsburg, New York, in which the rabbi of a Jewish day school [Hertz Frankel of Satmar] stole 6 million dollars from the Board of Education over several years by falsely identifying more than eighty individuals as school employees.
The problem in the observant community, however, is not merely occasional, nor does it often make headlines. Daily, in metropolises around the country, yarmulka-wearing criminal defendants appear before the bar of justice. In the early 1970s, a particularly imaginative criminal defense lawyer in New York City successfully sued the U.S. Bureau of Prisons to provide kosher food for one or two of his incarcerated clients. The sad truth is that these days, kosher food has become as commonplace in many penal institutions as it is on airlines.
Today, every day in the minimum-security camp at the Otisville Federal Correctional Institution in Rockland County, New York, there are sizeable minyanim, three times daily. A full-time rabbi attends to the congregation’s spiritual and religious needs. Daily religious classes are offered. Shabbat and holiday meals are provided. There are so many observant inmates -- inmates who were ostensibly observant at the time of their arrest, not those who “found God” after they broke the law, thereby increasing the numbers -- that such provisions are now available at a number of other federal penal institutions. Anyone practicing in the justice system of a large urban metropolis with a significant Jewish population -- New York, Los Angeles, and Miami, for example -- has seen a similar trend.
These observant defendants are not typically charged with street crime or narcotics trafficking. The most common charge is fraud: against businessmen and run-of-the-mill citizens alike, most frequently involving victims outside of the Jewish community; against the government; against insurance carriers; against banking institutions; health care fraud; money laundering; and stock swindling.
Perhaps most disturbing is a new breed of fraud involving observant community leaders, sometimes rabbis themselves, and intended to benefit the community itself, such as fraud against government spending programs for education and health care. The perpetrators in these cases don’t typically profit personally, but the government and the intended recipients of these government programs are no less defrauded of funds designated for a particular use. And more often than not, the community, including its lay and religious leaders, stands up for the perpetrators by defending, or at least excusing, their behavior. For example, following the convictions of four Hassidim in the New Square scandal, Hassidic leaders defended President Clinton’s pardon of these individuals on the grounds that the stolen funds were funneled back into their community rather than into their own pockets.
Most people have heard of Bernie Madoff. In 2008, he was charged and pleaded guilty to defrauding investors in the amount of over $50 billion, running the largest Ponzi scheme on record over at least the last three or four decades.
Jewish Ponzi Artist Bernie Madoff
In early December 2008, at the height of the U.S. economic meltdown, people of every professional and social standard found themselves scrambling to liquidate funds across accounts. Many of Madoff's clients were no exception, but when his investors came calling, he couldn't answer their cash requests. Under mounting pressure Madoff came clean, admitting massive investment fraud affecting many people -- including high-profile investors -- and knocking Wall Street and the world back on its heels.
Madoff had enjoyed an exemplary reputation in the financial community. His investors came from all walks of life and trusted him implicitly with their fund's management. Some of Madoff's more illustrious investors included a charitable organization funded by Steven Spielberg, actor Kevin Bacon and the owners of the New York Mets. Large banks and pension funds such as Spanish bank Banco Santander; HSBC; Royal Bank of Scotland; and Korea Teachers Pension were scammed by Madoff as well. Some of Madoff's individual investors ended up on the street, living out of cars and RVs.
The Wall Street Journal developed a list of all Madoff's victims.
Madoff pleaded guilty to charges of securities fraud, among others, and was sentenced to 150 years in a maximum-security prison. The courts are still sorting through Madoff's financial records in the wake of his arrest and indictment, trying to decide restitution and distribution to his investors with the money they can find. Still in prison, Madoff maintains that the big banks defrauded in his scheme were complicit.
Nothing has changed -- leopards don't change their spots. Neither do the Edomite Jews.
Jews and YEHOVAH's People Israel
Writes Charles Weisman,
Israel's rule and dominion on the earth was to weaken when in transgression to God's Laws -- "the stranger shall be the head, and you shall be the tail" (Deut. 28:44). We thus have to ask who has control and dominion over who, in this world? It is the white race that is losing its power and sovereignty to the Edomite Jews. It is the white race that has been put under financial bondage to the Jew monetary system. It is the white race that must now live under Jewish laws and governments.
It is the white nations (Germany, America, England) that the Jews have tricked into giving them money, aid and technology to support their antichristian and bastardized state in Palestine. And it is our political leaders who are controlled by Jew advisors and lobbying groups. This is all due to the legacy of the two races (Who is Esau-Edom? p. 88).
Two great forces have been "struggling" for dominion in the world. The Edomite Jews have gained the dominion and have broken the yoke of the white race from their necks as was prophesied to happen with Esau and Jacob.
The Jews have honed their predatory expertise at exploiting the weaknesses of White societies into a weapon of devastating potency. We must recognize the Edomite Jews for what they are: our relentless racial enemies who will stop at nothing to eradicate the White race. The Jews are driven by a fanatical religious imperative, an immutable spiritual depravity, to destroy the White race. It is a manifestation of the Jewish anti-soul. The Jews will not rest until they have exterminated all traces of the distinctive White genetic heritage through race mixing, dysgenics, and the destruction of any community (no matter how small or isolated) that even resembles a habitat that could sustain White prosperity.
Nothing will assuage Jewish anti-White hostility until the very memory of White accomplishments that have been an immeasurable benefit to the whole of human kind are perverted, vilified, and then forgotten. The Jews will not stop until every last White has stumbled (in a haze of hedonism, materialism, and reckless interracial rutting) into the uncaring kosher graves they have prepared for us. The only protection against this Jewish evil is to keep our homelands free of these vicious, inhuman enemies. We must expose the Jewish hand behind the dispossession of our homelands. We must stop White genocide.
As Thomas Jefferson once said, “Slavery to a military force can be abolished by an opposing force of arms. But a debtor’s enslavement to a creditor, no weapons can overthrow…”
The Roman Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC) said it best:
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through...all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.
Hope of Israel Ministries -- Preparing the Way for the Return of YEHOVAH God and His Messiah to This Earth to Set Up Their Government!
Hope of Israel Ministries
|Scan with your