Adam is translated from the Hebrew word "AWDAWM" and means White Man. The basic derivative means: "Ruddy complexion, show blood in the face, transparent white skin." The skin of the black and yellow races is not transparent nor is it with mongrels.

Even the ability to blush (show blood in the face) is confined to the White Race. This is caused by your sub-conscious which only YEHOVAH God controls, as He breathed His living spirit (Breath of Life) into Adam who passed it on to you, his now White Israelite descendants. You are an infinitesimal projection of your Creator, so when you do or say something embarrassing, your sub-conscious rushes excess blood to your face. The colored races, not having been endowed with YEHOVAH's spirit, have no abstract sense of right or wrong, consequently are never embarrassed.

When speaking of his descendants, the Hebrew just uses the word "AWDAWM" (White Man). Another word from the Hebrew is "ENOSH" which is used to imply an inferior, evil or wicked man, and is also used when referring to a pre-Adamic man. Psalms 10:18: "To judge the fatherless, and the oppressed, that the ENOSH MAN may no more oppress." Proverbs 28:5: "Evil men (ENOSH MEN) understood not justice, but they that seek the LORD understands all things." A third Hebrew word for man is "ISH" (female "ISHA"). Most translators completely ignore these words and use the word MAN for all three of them.

In the first Chapter of Genesis we find the word "day." This is incorrectly translated from the Hebrew word "YOME," which, like the Greek word "EON," means ERA or AGE, not a twenty-four hour day. The six days (ages) could have extended over several million years; no one knows exactly. During the first four days (ages) YEHOVAH God properly arranged this planet and provided it with every element essential to support plant, animal and human life. He re-formed it in an orderly manner, after having previously caused a great destruction of It, and ruin, which is referred to in the Bible as "void."

On the fifth day (age) YEHOVAH God created fish and fowl. He blessed them saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas and let fowl multiply in the earth." On the sixth day (age) YEHOVAH God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living creature, after its kind, and it was so." Then He continues (still the sixth day) "and God created man in his own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them. "REMEMBER THE LAST SIX WORDS, THEY ARE VERY IMPORTANT.

Writes Peter Meyer:

As we can see in verses 26 and 27 men and women were made at the same time, male and female He created them. Some would try to say that this is just a rough outline of the creation of Adam and Eve, that in chapter two of Genesis we have just a more detailed account of chapter one, but they would indeed be wrong. The reason for this is simple because in verse 28-29 the Mighty Authority ["ELOHIM" in the oldest manuscripts] said to them, that is He spoke to them both and told both of them to be fruitful etc. And in verse 31 we are told that the Mighty Authority [ELOHIM] saw ALL, the totality of the works of creation and said it was very good, therefore men and woman, male and female were created before the seventh day of rest. (ibid., p. 4)

Another interesting aspect is the use of the word tselem meaning image, and rendered in the masculine; and demuth meaning likeness and rendered in the feminine....The word tselem, rendered in the masculine, has the meaning of an outline, that is an outline of the original, it is kind of like a shadow cast against the wall....The word demuth, rendered in the feminine, talks of a likeness but as in a genetic likeness.

The root word is dam, and means blood. So this word is talking about the likeness that is passed through the blood. It is talking about the likeness that is passed on to the child from it’s mother and father, therefore it is a genetic likeness. I know this also posses many questions, none of which I have an answer to, but there are far reaching implications here that could indeed turn the whole world of our understanding upside down, inside out and any which way. (The Making of Mankind and of Adam, p. 5)

Continues Meyer:

Now as stated before men and women were created at the same time, that is according to verse 27, where it states, “...male and female He [ELOHIM] created them...” Then in verse 28 we have the Mighty Authority [ELOHIM] blessing "them," and saying of "them," “...be fruitful, become numerous and fill the land...” Now what is interesting is the placement of the Aleph-Taw (אֵת) before the words "them," the first when He blesses them and the second when He tells them to fill the land.

Now most modern Hebrew grammarians tell us that the usage of the Aleph-Taw [אֵת] is nothing more than a mere grammatical tool, that is a marker for the direct object of the verb, something we have no equivalent for in our English language. But there is a problem with this understanding, throughout the Torah, Prophets, and Writings the Aleph-Taw [אֵת ] is only used about one third of the time a verb is used, so there is no consistency for it’s use in this manner. I believe this is a rabbinical deception to takeaway the true focus of the Aleph-Taw [אֵת].

The Aleph-Taw (אֵת)

In the center of verse 1 of Genesis 1 are found seven Hebrew words; then after B-re'shiyt bara Elohim there is a fourth untranslatable word. That fourth word is actually two Hebrew letters: the aleph and the taw. The aleph-taw [אֵת] expression serves a grammatical purpose in that it points to the direct object of the sentence, but these two letters do not actually form a word -- rather, they express an understanding. This is the basic difference found between Greek based languages, such as English, and the Hebrew language. Whereas Greek and English form a static, rigid architecture; Hebrew is more fluid -- promoting understanding rather than a definitive, straight line presentation.

The aleph-taw [אֵת] character symbol has been hidden in plain sight from the beginning, starting with the original Paleo-Hebrew scrolls written by the hand of Moses and the Prophets, then copied by scribes for thousands of years thereafter into modern Hebrew -- but not translated by the Greek Septuagint, the Latin Vulgate, the King James or subsequent English bible translations because it was not considered a word. However, as we shall see, the placement of these two Hebrew letters throughout scripture has far reaching implications.

The aleph is the first letter of the Hebrew alephbet (alphabet), and the taw is the last letter of the alephbet. It is in the placement of these two very significant letters at strategic locations within many verses of Hebrew scripture that express the understanding of a total completeness. It is equivalent to saying "from alpha to omega, from a to z, from first to last, from beginning to end." We see the aleph-taw [אֵת ] symbol, in association with YEHOVAH (YHVH), used in hundreds of places in the Original Writings.

Hebrew scholars agree that originally in Paleo-Hebrew, the first letter of the alephbet, the aleph letter, meant "Strength" with its letter symbol an Ox Head. The last letter of the alephbet is the letter taw, which had as its letter picture an X -- a symbol or sign of "Covenant". Consequently, the aleph-taw [אֵת] symbol literally means "Strength of the Covenant" when used in original Hebrew text and was placed to create emphasis as a direct object pointer to the workings of YEHOVAH God concerning His covenant, wherever it was placed throughout the Tanakh (the Original Writings).

So, from the Hebraic perspective these words are written in, Genesis 1:1 is seen as "In the beginning Elohim created the aleph-taw". In other words, the very first thing Elohim created were the letters from which all life and all physical things spring forth -- the divinely ordained building blocks of life (Elohim is commonly translated as "God" in the English translations of Genesis 1:1 -- but, Elohim is specific and unique to Hebraic thinking, occurring only in Hebrew and in no other languages). Ancient Hebrews believed that Elohim had to create this first because it is all the letters of the Hebrew alephbet that form the Torah, the word of YEHOVAH God -- which, according to the word of YEHOVAH, is YEHOVAH God Himself.

Actually, if the words of Genesis 1 are read closely we find that no creative process takes place in the first six days except the beasts and man. Everything else was formed from material that was already created in verse one. This is the same statement contained in John 1:1, "In the beginning was the WORD and the WORD was with YHVH and the WORD was YHVH." Any Hebrew reading that verse would give it a hearty amen! He would say, "In the beginning was the WORD (the alephbet), the WORD was with YHVH, and YHVH was the WORD (the alephbet)."

YEHOVAH is the alephbet and is revered for the same reason; the letters of the Words of Torah ARE the Source of Life, YEHOVAH God -- not Yeshua the Son who, in his words of John 17:6 tells us that he did not replace YEHOVAH God, but manifested the Name of the Father; in which are found the Glory, the Nature and Essence of YEHOVAH God expressed in Exodus 34:1-7 -- and, by which, those who follow the Messiah are called to do the same in John 17:20-23.

Adds Peter Meyer:

It is obvious that the Aleph-Taw [אֵת] is made up from the two letters, aleph and the taw. The Aleph a is a pictograph of an ox head and means power, strength, might. The taw t is a pictograph of an "X" and carries the meaning of sign, signature, etc. Together they give the meaning of great or mighty sign, it can also mean great or mighty signature. When we see this in the scriptures it can represent the Messiah, the great sign, or the great covenant, or the great contract we sign. When we see this in the text we should look out for and search out the great hidden truths of the Messiah and the covenant.

But, at times these two letters can simply carry the meaning of with, together with, in association with, etc, How we discern the meaning is the context. In these verses [Genesis 1:27-28], and looking at the usage, I believe the meaning of together or together with comes into force. The reason is simple, they [mankind] cannot become numerous and fill the earth singularly! There has to be both male and female for them to copulate and fill the earth. Therefore these verses cannot be talking about a single man called Adam, not forgetting that Adam was on his own for many years before his mate was made from his rib. (The Making of Mankind and of Adam, p. 6)

We are going to call this the creation of pre-Adamic mankind, that is men and women without the neshama or "Breath of Life," that is people without the character of YEHOVAH God which was given to Adam alone at the time of his making and who is the start, not of mankind, but of the Adamic line of humanity.

"Also talking of this creation of mankind, I believe it was the desire of the Mighty Authority [ELOHIM] that the mankind He would create would rule over creation as good and beneficial rulers, hence the jussive mood of the word radah in verse 26. Then in verse 28 when blessing them we see the word kabash used instead and holds a totally different meaning. Kabash gives the idea of conquering and controlling a people or land by force; it gives the idea of violating and molesting, of enslavement and bondage.

"This is exactly what mankind, those without the character of the living Mighty Authority [ELOHIM], have done throughout the eons of time. This is exactly how mankind acts today, they take what they want, they rape and pillage the land for their own profit and gain, they abuse, enslave and rape men women and children; even in this modern era they subjugate, enslave and abuse the masses of the people at will. I think [YEHOVAH] changed the word radah for the word kabash because He saw exactly how ‘mankind’ would turn out, hence the need for a man to be made later who would be separated out from mankind, who would be put in an enclosed garden, away from the masses of mankind, to learn the ways and path of [YEHOVAH God]" (ibid., p. 6).

Concludes Meyer:

At verse 31 we are told that the Mighty Authority [ELOHIM] saw and reflected upon all the of the day and said that it was very good. As there is the Aleph-Taw [אֵת] placed before "the totality of..." it could be read as this, “and the Mighty Authority [ELOHIM] saw and reflected upon together the totality of...” Meaning that He was indeed looking not only on the work accomplished on day six but upon all the work accomplished over all six days, and that He saw the totality of His work of those six days and saw that it was all good. The final act in all creation was this act of the creation of men and women, mankind, male and female.

And on the seventh day (age) "God ended His work which he had made; and He rested on the seventh day (age) from all His work which He had made."

The Making of Adam

The seventh day (age) passes and the ages are no longer numbered, but eight usually follows seven, so I believe we can safely assume we are now in the eighth day (age). Genesis 2:5 says, "...and there was not an AWDAWM (White Man) to till the ground." The sixth day (age) creation were not tilling the ground; no agriculture, no progress, no civilization. They were just warriors and hunters eating food from the land that YEHOVAH God had provided. A superior type of man was needed to bring forth YEHOVAH's Kingdom on this earth.

Notes Peter Meyer:

Reading verses four to six [of Genesis chapter 2] they do seem to strongly suggest that this account being told now is indeed an amplification of the making of mankind in chapter one, but if this is definitely the case then we are eventually left with many problems that are impossible to solve, and some of which are impossible to solve in righteousness. (The Making of Mankind and of Adam, p. 10)

In the account in chapters 2, we shall see that men and women were made at different times and with quite a time gap between them. Also, on this point the woman was made with a totally different process than that of Adam. Yet in chapter 1 we are told that men and women were made at the same time and it is implied that they were made using the same creative process.  So this is a conundrum that needs to be addressed.

In Genesis 2:7-8, the word "create" is not used; this time it says YEHOVAH God "formed" Adam (THE AWDAWM) of the dust (elements) of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and THE AWDAWM becomes a living soul. YEHOVAH God breathed His living spirit into him and THE AWDAWM became His physical offspring, an infinitesimal piece of YEHOVAH God Himself. Adam passed this LIVING SPIRIT on to you, his White Israelite children.

Genesis 2:18-23: "And the LORD God said, It is not good that THE AWDAWM should be alone. I will make him an help-mate fit for him."

Isn't this kind of strange since YEHOVAH God had already created females on the sixth day -- possibly thousands of years before Adam?

Continues Peter Meyer:

...we shall see as we go through chapter two that all the animals were brought before Adam to be named, OK so far.  But then we are told that amongst them there could not be found a suitable mate for Adam. Most just skim over this without looking at the very serious implications of this. Can we honestly think or believe that [YEHOVAH], the Mighty Authority, who never changes, would be searching among the beasts of the field, the apes, the monkeys, the cats, dogs, elephants, etc. for a mate?

If this is the case then [YEHOVAH], the Mighty Authority, must have had the idea that bestiality was in some form OK! But this would go against His whole character and nature who later condemns bestiality, and as He never changes then this could not be so. Therefore, there must have been beings of genetic likeness and compatibility among those which he named mankind created in chapter one.

So YEHOVAH God brought all these pre-Adamic creations, including the beasts of the field before THE AWDAWM who named them but could not find a help-mate fit for him. Do you believe for one moment that YEHOVAH God expected Adam to find a wife among the four legged beasts of the field? I doubt if even a college professor would believe that. These "beasts of the field" (chay'yath) were the two legged, articulate members of the beast creation. The PRE-ADAMIC colored races were not fit to mate with Adam for one very important reason we will cover later in the article.

Paul states in his first Epistle to the Corinthians, "All flesh is not the same flesh, but there is one kind of flesh of THE AWDAWM, another flesh of beasts, another of fish and another of birds". (By the way, this verse alone completely refutes evolution).

"So how," asks Meyer, "do we deal with these three verses which implies this is an amplification of chapter one, but are in fact talking about separate events? I believe the answer is in the first use of the name [YEHOVAH] and the twice use of the Aleph-Taw [] in these three verses."

He goes on to explain --

The use of a personal name is very important for it implies relationship. Knowing the name of a person or being is the first step in building a relationship, it is the foundation of all that comes afterwards.  Also, the idea of a name in Hebrew is more than just some identifier, it is a description of character, reputation, renown and purpose. Like the name [YEHOVAH], translated into English it means "He continually exists."  

"In chapter one [of Genesis], when talking about the creation of men and women, the personal name of [YEHOVAH] was never used, thereby implying there is no personal relationship between the creator and mankind in general. This relationship would indeed start with Adam and this is why it is now, with the making of Adam, that we are introduced to the name the creator chose for Himself, [YEHOVAH]. I believe the relationship with His creation would start with Adam, hence Adam was separated and put in an enclosed garden....But sadly, as we shall see...he failed the ultimate test, and we would need a second Adam, the Messiah, to fulfill that task and redeem a people [YEHOVAH's people, Israel] who would end up being like king David, a people after the heart of [YEHOVAH] God." (The Making of Mankind and of Adam, p. 11).

Next, as Peter Meyer points out, is the twice use of the Aleph-Taw [] which both times are connected to the ground, adamah. When we see this it is often used as a signature of and for the covenant, so there is normally a covenant connection to the text.  And thirdly it is also used as a sign for the Messiah. Meyer believes that we are also being told something about the future covenants, that is, this is talking of the covenant ground as both are connected to the word adamah.

"So I believe," says Meyer:

we are being told here that there was no one to cultivate the covenant ground, and the reason for this was there was no one who was in a covenant relationship with [ELOHIM] at this time and therefore they were not able to or worthy to dwell in and cultivate the covenant ground. But where is the covenant ground? The answer is simple anywhere [YEHOVAH] deems to put His name.

Still keeping with the Aleph-Taw [] and it’s special meaning and significance we now see it used in conjunction with the man, Adam. The first use is in verse seven where [YEHOVAH] actually makes him, that is He makes the "Aleph-Taw man." Then in verse eight we see the "Aleph-Taw" man placed in the enclosed Garden. The enclosed and protected garden was a set-apart place, a place set apart from the rest of the world.

It was the place where [YEHOVAH]...would walk and teach Adam His ways....So Adam was set apart and placed into the enclosed and protected garden. This is the starting place, the first steps, of the Creator of the universe to build a relationship with His creation, which was the whole purpose of creation in the first place. This, I believe, is the deeper meaning, the deeper truth that we are to search for, the great sign the Aleph-Taw [] represents, and this is why we are to search out the scriptures for these wonderful nuggets of truth.

A Companion Fit for Adam

Here in the verses in Genesis 2 we find a very important point in dealing with the making of the covenant man separate from the previous men and women created in chapter one. The point is this, from what was YEHOVAH God looking for a helper for the covenant men, Adam? I use the term "looking" because we are told that one could not be found for him.

In The Making of Mankind and of Adam, author Peter Meyer explains:

In verse eighteen there is the Hebrew word ‘aseh, hv[, normally translated as "make." But this translation does not make any sense in light of what we are told in verse twenty where it states that a suitable helper could not be found for the covenant man. Let us face reality here, if [YEHOVAH] was going to immediately name a mate for the covenant man, a suitable woman, then why did He not just go ahead and make her, why the pretense of looking? And I will state here that there is absolutely no pretense with [YEHOVAH] therefore it must have been a serious search.

The Hebrew word ‘aseh has many meanings, but primarily it means to do or make something, and do not forget looking for something is actually doing something. It can also mean to work, prepare, produce, to attend to, to act, to acquire, etc. So as we can see it has many meanings and the only way to know which one we should use is the context of the text.

In this instance we can see from the context, especially with the context of verse twenty, the meaning of make does not fit here, otherwise, as I said why the pretense of looking? No, the only translation that fits the context is that of "acquire." To acquire something you can either go out and look for something, go out and buy something, or even go and make something, you can use any means to acquire something.

"Another point that needs to be emphasized regarding this word ‘aseh is that it is written in the Cohortive mood, the 1st person mood of volition and strong intention. So here we are being told that this is something YEHOVAH God chose to do and that He felt strongly about it."

To continue we find that "in verse nineteen we have the Hebrew word chay’yath,  tyx, translated as ‘living beings.’ The root of this word is ‘chay,’ yx, and means life, alive, stomach. Chay’yath literally means the renewal of life from food. Therefore this word is talking about any living, breathing life form that eats to live; this also being linked to ‘adamah,’ the ground, we can deduce that this word is referring to every single creature that lives, breathes, eats and walks the earth, and not just the ‘beasts’ of the field, which is a totally different word, behemah, which is also used in verse twenty along side chay’yath" (ibid., p. 20).  

"As I just mentioned this idea is further backed up in verse twenty where we are told that the man appointed names to the cattle, behemah, as well as to the birds of the sky, then we are told that he named all living beings, chay’yath. This proves my contention that the word chay’yath is not just referring to the animals, beasts of the field, but it must refer to all living beings that walk the earth, which would also include the tribes of mankind previously created in chapter one, on the sixth day by [ELOHIM]."

The main point that we want to bring out in these three verses is this: Do we honestly think that YEHOVAH God, who created all things, would look for a mate, a partner for the covenant man Adam, among all the animals of the field? Would YEHOVAH God search her out from among the cattle, the elephants, the pigs, tigers, etc, etc. Or perhaps He searched her out from among the apes or the many species of monkeys? What would be the point in all that? YEHOVAH God knows full well that they would all be genetically incompatible to and for the covenant man Adam.

"No indeed," states Meyer,

there must have been other life forms that were brought before the covenant man to name that were at the very least genetically compatible and that would not involve some sort of bestiality, which by the way, goes against the very nature of [YEHOVAH].

Therefore there must have been other people on the earth that were brought before the covenant man to name and it was from these differing people that a mate was searched for. These people must have been those created before him, the men and women of [Genesis] chapter one and made on the sixth day.

"So we can deduce," continues Meyer,

that there were two reasons that all living beings were brought before the covenant man, the first and foremost, I believe, was to find him a mate, a helper. The reason I say this was the main reason is because of context, the context of verse eighteen, where it gives us the primary reason, that of it not being good and beneficial for the covenant man to be alone, and where we are told the acquisition of a helper for him was important. The second reason, I believe, was a test of the covenant man’s wisdom and understanding in seeing what he would name the living creatures and the birds.  

"The Hebrew word for name is ‘shem,’ mv, and means character, purpose, renown, reputation, name, and even breath. In ancient Hebrew culture the breath of a person carries that person’s character, so in naming a bird or a living thing you are reflecting that creature’s character, purpose, or reputation within that name. So I see this as a test of the wisdom of the covenant man in his choosing the names to see if he understood the ways and language of [YEHOVAH], that is in his naming did he reflect that character of the creature being named? For we are told [YEHOVAH] wanted to see what he would name them" (The Making of Mankind and of Adam, p. 21).

Upon further study of these verses, we can see that it was after this naming that the covenant man was first called Adam in the scriptures, so it was probably at this time the covenant man, now officially Adam, passed this test: “And the man (adam) appointed names to all the cattle and to all the birds of the sky and to all living beings of the field, but for Adam (there is no definite article before the word ‘adam’ therefore this is the first time used of that word as his proper name).”

"If I am right" says Meyer, "and the other people made before the Covenant man, Adam, were brought before him also to be named then they must have been at least genetically compatible, and if this was the case then why was no mate, helper found for Adam? There must have been plenty of women from the tribes of mankind that were genetically suitable so why was one not found?"

We believe that the answer is to be found in verse 7 of Genesis chapter 2, and it centers around the words neshamah chayim. As we saw earlier in the article the word chayim means stomach, life and living. Peter Meyer explains:

Now the word neshamah is made up of the nun, shin, mem and hey; hmvn, with the two letter parent root of  shem, mv as we also saw means character, purpose, reputation, renown, name and breath. In ancient Hebrew culture and thought the breath of a person carries that person’s character. The child root from this is the three letter root of neshem, which literally means to pant or breath; and with the hey at the end added, which also feminises the word, it comes to mean breath, live, spirit, inspiration. Now with breath linked to character, especially in the ancient Hebrew thinking, this can also be translated as, "the character of the living," as well as "the breath of life" or "the living."  

So what was given to the covenant man, Adam, was not the simple ability to breath, no indeed, what was given to him was the very character of life itself, the very character of [YEHOVAH], the living Mighty Authority of creation. As [YEHOVAH], as well as His words, are life itself, and the character is also bound up in his words, then Adam was indeed given the character of [YEHOVAH], and it was because of this infusion of [YEHOVAH’s] character that he was able to have a loving, familial relationship directly with Him, it was why and how he was able to walk and talk, to interact directly with [YEHOVAH] in the enclosed and protected garden.

It was this very character that was missing from every single person outside the enclosed garden.  It was missing from every single person, from every woman that was brought before him to be named. Not one of them was compatible to Adam because not one of them had the neshamah within their DNA.  Hence, as we will soon see, that was why a rib was taken from Adam from which a compatible helper, woman was fashioned.

So YEHOVAH God had to make a help-mate for Adam: Genesis 2:22 says, "...and the rib which the LORD God has taken from "ISH" (man) made He an "ISHA" (woman) and brought her unto THE AWDAWM (Adam). Remember YEHOVAH's law in the first Chapter of Genesis: Everything He had made is good after its kind. This also applied to Adam: his wife's (help-mate) seed must be identical, as like begets like.

Adam's Rib

In verses 21-24 of Genesis chapter 2 we have the first ever recorded account of genetic manipulation and engineering. This happened many thousands of years before modern man ever discovered the Genome. Adam was, for all intense and purposes, anaesthetized and whilst under this Divine anesthetic he was operated upon and a rib was removed from his side.

Meyer notes that,

In the past I never knew why it was a rib that was taken, I thought that it maybe had something to do with the genetics and that some day some geneticist would discover this answer. Others would say it was because it was near the heart and that the woman would then be close to his heart. But now I think both ideas are wrong and that the answer is far more simple than either of the above. And the answer is interestingly that ribs are the only bones in the body that can grow back once removed so long as the tissue around the bone, the periosteum, is left intact. If this was the case then Adam ended up with the same number of ribs as any other person. And that is why it was a rib taken and not some other bone.

Now to debunk a myth. It is believed by many that women, in general, have more ribs than men, this is an absolute fable, it is a myth. If someone had his hand or his foot cut off then proceeded to have children, then his children would not be born with a missing foot or hand, no indeed, they would be born with all appendages intact. And likewise, even if Adam’s rib never grew back all his children, male and female, would be born with the right amount of ribs. The deciding factor in what body parts we have is not if we have a foot or not, or one less rib, it is in the genetic code within us and losing body parts does not in any way alter this genetic code.

"But" explains Meyer, "the genetic code taken from the rib can be, and indeed was, manipulated in order to produce a woman. Therefore Eve was, in essence, a manipulated clone of Adam, yes indeed fully female, but genetically she must have been nearly a replica of Adam....it shows that what was given to Adam, the Neshamah [Breath of Life], was something that was imprinted upon Adam’s DNA, just as the Torah will be written on our hearts, or our very DNA! And this is why a mate could not be found for Adam as no one else outside the enclosed garden would have had this ‘Neshamah’ written on their DNA."

Genesis 2:21: "...and [YEHOVAH] closed up the flesh in its place."

The Generations of Adam

Genesis 5:1: "This is the book of the generations of THE AWDAWM (White Man)."

That is correct, your Bible is the history of and the prophecy for the White Race ONLY. There are no generations for the colored races in the Bible, but you can trace your blood line, person by person from Adam to the Messiah.

The Black Muslims are correct when they say that YEHOVAH God is not their god, but the God of the WHITE MAN.

History, science and archeology back up the Bible one hundred percent. Skeletons of Whites, Negroes and Asiatics are far different and easily identifiable. Radioactive tests determine the age of these archeological findings, not to the day or even the year but very close. Skeletons of negroes have been found in the caves of Kilimanjaro and elsewhere dating back some 74,000 years, and Asiatics have been uncovered dating back almost 1,750,000 years ago. However, and this is very important: no trace of a White Man has ever been found over 7,400 years old, which coincides with the Bible and Adam being formed about 5500 B.C.

Do you still believe Adam and Eve were the first man and woman on earth? Turn to Genesis 4:14, where Cain says to YEHOVAH God: "Everywhere I go men shall seek to slay me." What men? And Cain went into the land of Nod, found a wife and built a city. All by himself? Quite a Herculean task, and where did he find that wife? Your minister says there were only three people left on earth, Adam, Eve and Cain. Did Cain choose a four legged beast? OF COURSE NOT! There were large numbers of pre-Adamites in the area and Cain married one of them, producing the first white mongrel.

Adam and Eve being pure white did not have colored genes and could not possibly produce negroes or Asiatics. A man cannot exist before his father, yet you are supposed to believe that all men are descended from Adam. Little wonder people turn away from the Bible when they are asked to believe such utter nonsense.

In one of his sermons Bertrand L. Comparet gives an absolutely perfect explanation of our position in the world today. I will quote direct:

Because of the spiritual understanding which God put in the AWDAWM, today the White Race has the highest civilization, the greatest freedom, the highest standard of living, in the world. They are the so-called "have" nations. We have not hated the other races; we have tried to help them, to show them our ways. But all of, them have hated us. In the centuries when we were very few against their many, they repeatedly tried to conquer and destroy us, but God's watchful care over His people did not allow that to happen, although several times they came dangerously close to success. In lands rich with minerals, they sit in wretchedness and poverty, too lacking in enterprise to mine the enormous wealth beneath their feet.

In lands where the fertile soil and ample rainfall covers the ground with lush growth, they live in perpetual hunger, because they are too dull to clear the land and plant it to food crops. If we provide the capital to pay them for clearing their land and planting and harvesting useful crops, or for digging and refining the minerals in their soil, they curse us for "exploiting" them; if we do not, they curse us for being indifferent to their misery. Now through the United Nations where they outnumber and outvote us, they plan to rule us, plunder us, enslave us, reduce us to their level. Well did God classify them as "ENOSH," lacking utterly in the spiritual understanding necessary to follow God's way.

Now forget the fallacies you have been taught, and reread your Bible. Most of the statements you could never understand will become very clear and fall into place like pieces of a gigantic jig-saw puzzle. Be sure to read our companion article, The TWO Creation Accounts of Genesis! and Just What Was Cain Afraid Of?

Get these facts into the hands of your fellow church members. Insist that your minister study the Scriptures and start telling the truth. Let him know, in no uncertain terms, that you and the rest of the church supporters have the power to replace him.

Hope of Israel Ministries -- Courage for the Sake of Truth is Far Better Than Silence for the Sake of Unity!

Hope of Israel Ministries P.O. Box 853 Azusa, CA 91702, U.S.A. www.hope-of-israel.org

Scan with your Smartphone for more information